Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23051844›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2012

Cancer stem cell definitions and terminology: the devil is in the details.

Peter Valent, Dominique Bonnet, Ruggero De Maria, Tsvee Lapidot, Mhairi Copland, Junia V Melo, Christine Chomienne, Fumihiko Ishikawa, Jan Jacob Schuringa, Giorgio Stassi and 12 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 382 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
382citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

382 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. State-of-the-Art Liver Cancer Organoids: Modeling Cancer Stem Cell Heterogeneity for Personalized Treatment.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

322 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Peter ValentThe Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Hematology & Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna & Ludwig-Boltzmann Cluster Oncology, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. peter.valent@meduniwien.ac.at
Dominique Bonnet
Ruggero De Maria
Tsvee Lapidot
Mhairi Copland
Junia V Melo
Christine Chomienne
Fumihiko Ishikawa
Jan Jacob Schuringa
Giorgio Stassi
Brian Huntly
Harald Herrmann
Jean Soulier
Alexander Roesch
Gerrit Jan Schuurhuis
Stefan Wöhrer
Michel Arock
Johannes Zuber
Sabine Cerny-Reiterer
Hans E Johnsen
Michael Andreeff
Connie Eaves

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800784Wellcome Trust 079249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cancer stem cell (CSC) concept has important therapeutic implications, but its investigation has been hampered both by a lack of consistency in the terms used for these cells and by how they are defined. Evidence of their heterogeneous origins, frequencies and their genomic, as well as their phenotypic and functional, properties has added to the confusion and has fuelled new ideas and controversies. Participants in The Year 2011 Working Conference on CSCs met to review these issues and to propose a conceptual and practical framework for CSC terminology. More precise reporting of the parameters that are used to identify CSCs and to attribute responses to them is also recommended as key to accelerating an understanding of their biology and developing more effective methods for their eradication in patients.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Stem CellsTerminology as TopicAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell Transformation, NeoplasticClonal EvolutionHumans

Identifiers

PMID23051844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.