Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23051645›Full record

ArticleGenetics2012

A comprehensive genetic approach for improving prediction of skin cancer risk in humans.

Ana I Vazquez, Gustavo de los Campos, Yann C Klimentidis, Guilherme J M Rosa, Daniel Gianola, Nengjun Yi, David B Allison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana I VazquezSection on Statistical Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. anainesvs@gmail.com
Gustavo de los Campos
Yann C Klimentidis
Guilherme J M Rosa
Daniel Gianola
Nengjun Yi
David B Allison

Funding

Bayesian Methods for Mapping Complex Epistatic GenesR01GM069430 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI YI, NENGJUN · 2005 to 2013
$2.3M
Statistical Tools for Whole-Genome Prediction of Complex Traits and DiseasesR01GM101219 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DE LOS CAMPOS, GUSTAVO · 2012 to 2017
$1.6M
Genome-wide Structured Association Testing & Regional Admixture MappingR01GM077490 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LIU, NIANJUN · 2007 to 2010
$1.1M
Factors Affecting Prediction Accuracy of Complex Human Traits and DiseasesR01GM099992 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DE LOS CAMPOS, GUSTAVO · 2012 to 2015
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069430NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077490NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM077490NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099992NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM099992NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101219NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM101219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of genetic risk for disease is needed for preventive and personalized medicine. Genome-wide association studies have found unprecedented numbers of variants associated with complex human traits and diseases. However, these variants explain only a small proportion of genetic risk. Mounting evidence suggests that many traits, relevant to public health, are affected by large numbers of small-effect genes and that prediction of genetic risk to those traits and diseases could be improved by incorporating large numbers of markers into whole-genome prediction (WGP) models. We developed a WGP model incorporating thousands of markers for prediction of skin cancer risk in humans. We also considered other ways of incorporating genetic information into prediction models, such as family history or ancestry (using principal components, PCs, of informative markers). Prediction accuracy was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) estimated in a cross-validation. Incorporation of genetic information (i.e., familial relationships, PCs, or WGP) yielded a significant increase in prediction accuracy: from an AUC of 0.53 for a baseline model that accounted for nongenetic covariates to AUCs of 0.58 (pedigree), 0.62 (PCs), and 0.64 (WGP). In summary, prediction of skin cancer risk could be improved by considering genetic information and using a large number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a WGP model, which allows for the detection of patterns of genetic risk that are above and beyond those that can be captured using family history. We discuss avenues for improving prediction accuracy and speculate on the possible use of WGP to prospectively identify individuals at high risk.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseModels, GeneticArea Under CurveCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenome, HumanHumansMaleModels, StatisticalOdds RatioPedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotideROC CurveSkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID23051645
PMCPMC3512154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.