ArticleGenetics2012
A comprehensive genetic approach for improving prediction of skin cancer risk in humans.
Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local genetic covariance between serum urate and kidney function estimated with Bayesian multitrait models.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Genetic correlations between traits associated with hyperuricemia, gout, and comorbidities.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021Article
- Incorporating Genome Annotation Into Genomic Prediction for Carcass Traits in Chinese Simmental Beef Cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Genome-wide association studies and genetic testing: understanding the science, success, and future of a rapidly developing field.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 2019Review
- Review
- Design of training populations for selective phenotyping in genomic prediction.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Impact of an Educational Intervention Based on the BASNEF Model on Skin Cancer Preventive Behavior of College StudentsAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2018Article
- Will Big Data Close the Missing Heritability Gap?Genetics · 2017Article
- Prediction of years of life after diagnosis of breast cancer using omics and omic-by-treatment interactions.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2017Article
- Predicted Residual Error Sum of Squares of Mixed Models: An Application for Genomic Prediction.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- Whole genome prediction and heritability of childhood asthma phenotypes.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2016Article
- Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
- Article
- Genomic Prediction Accounting for Residual Heteroskedasticity.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Explicit Modeling of Ancestry Improves Polygenic Risk Scores and BLUP Prediction.Genetic epidemiology · 2015Article
- Genomic prediction of complex human traits: relatedness, trait architecture and predictive meta-models.Human molecular genetics · 2015Article
- Joint prediction of multiple quantitative traits using a Bayesian multivariate antedependence model.Heredity · 2015Article
- Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance-covariance matrix.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Assessment of whole-genome regression for type II diabetes.PloS one · 2015Article
- Integrated genomic and BMI analysis for type 2 diabetes risk assessment.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prediction of genetic risk for disease is needed for preventive and personalized medicine. Genome-wide association studies have found unprecedented numbers of variants associated with complex human traits and diseases. However, these variants explain only a small proportion of genetic risk. Mounting evidence suggests that many traits, relevant to public health, are affected by large numbers of small-effect genes and that prediction of genetic risk to those traits and diseases could be improved by incorporating large numbers of markers into whole-genome prediction (WGP) models. We developed a WGP model incorporating thousands of markers for prediction of skin cancer risk in humans. We also considered other ways of incorporating genetic information into prediction models, such as family history or ancestry (using principal components, PCs, of informative markers). Prediction accuracy was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) estimated in a cross-validation. Incorporation of genetic information (i.e., familial relationships, PCs, or WGP) yielded a significant increase in prediction accuracy: from an AUC of 0.53 for a baseline model that accounted for nongenetic covariates to AUCs of 0.58 (pedigree), 0.62 (PCs), and 0.64 (WGP). In summary, prediction of skin cancer risk could be improved by considering genetic information and using a large number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a WGP model, which allows for the detection of patterns of genetic risk that are above and beyond those that can be captured using family history. We discuss avenues for improving prediction accuracy and speculate on the possible use of WGP to prospectively identify individuals at high risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.