Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23051643›Full record

ArticleGenetics2012

Sister chromatids segregate at mitosis without mother-daughter bias in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Brice E Keyes, Kenneth D Sykes, Courtney E Remington, Daniel J Burke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Unbiased segregation of yeast chromatids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2013
    Review
  3. Unbiased segregation of fission yeast chromosome 2 strands to daughter cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brice E KeyesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22906, USA.
Kenneth D Sykes
Courtney E Remington
Daniel J Burke
University of Virginia · USRockefeller University · US

Funding

Mitotic regulation by checkpoints in budding yeastR01GM086502 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BURKE, DANIEL J · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM086502NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is evidence accumulating for nonrandom segregation of one or more chromosomes during mitosis in different cell types. We use cell synchrony and two methods to show that all chromatids of budding yeast segregate randomly and that there is no mother-daughter bias with respect to Watson and Crick-containing strands of DNA.

Indexed as

ChromatidsMitosisChromosome SegregationChromosomes, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID23051643
PMCPMC3512160
OpenAlexW2172219241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.