Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23050505›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2012

Evaluate, assess, treat: development and evaluation of the EAT framework to increase effective communication regarding sensitive oral-systemic health issues.

R D DeBate, D Cragun, A A Gallentine, H H Severson, T Shaw, C Cantwell, S Christiansen, A Koerber, W Hendricson, S L Tomar and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Eating disorders and oral health: a scoping review.Journal of eating disorders · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

R D DeBateDepartment of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. rdebate@health.usf.edu
D Cragun
A A Gallentine
H H Severson
T Shaw
C Cantwell
S Christiansen
A Koerber
W Hendricson
S L Tomar
K McCormack Brown
L A Tedesco
Deschutes Research · USUniversity of South Florida · USUniversity of Florida · USEmory University · USInterVision Media (United States) · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
Adapting a web-based eating disorder program for oral health trainingRC1DE020274 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI DEBATE, RITA D, SEVERSON, HERBERT H · 2009 to 2010
$959k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NIDCR NIH HHS 1RC1DE020274-01NIDCR NIH HHS RC1 DE020274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral healthcare providers are likely to encounter a number of sensitive oral/systemic health issues whilst interacting with patients. The purpose of the current study was to develop and evaluate a framework aimed at oral healthcare providers to engage in active secondary prevention of eating disorders (i.e. early detection of oral manifestations of disordered eating behaviours, patient approach and communication, patient-specific oral treatment, and referral to care) for patients presenting with signs of disordered eating behaviours. The EAT Framework was developed based on the Brief Motivational Interviewing (B-MI) conceptual framework and comprises three continuous steps: Evaluating, Assessing, and Treating. Using a group-randomized control design, 11 dental hygiene (DH) and seven dental (D) classes from eight institutions were randomized to either the intervention or control conditions. Both groups completed pre- and post-intervention assessments. Hierarchical linear models were conducted to measure the effects of the intervention whilst controlling for baseline levels. Statistically significant improvements from pre- to post-intervention were observed in the Intervention group compared with the Control group on knowledge of eating disorders and oral findings, skills-based knowledge, and self-efficacy (all P < 0.01). Effect sizes ranged from 0.57 to 0.95. No statistically significant differences in outcomes were observed by type of student. Although the EAT Framework was developed as part of a larger study on secondary prevention of eating disorders, the procedures and skills presented can be applied to other sensitive oral/systemic health issues. Because the EAT Framework was developed by translating B-MI principles and procedures, the framework can be easily adopted as a non-confrontational method for patient communication.

Indexed as

CommunicationDentist-Patient RelationsEducation, DentalFeeding and Eating DisordersInterviews as TopicOral HealthDental HygienistsFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMotivationSelf EfficacyStudents, Dental

Identifiers

PMID23050505
PMCPMC3471784
OpenAlexW1925770737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.