Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23050036›Full record

ReviewOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2012

Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA repair in selected eukaryotic aging model systems.

Ricardo Gredilla, Christian Garm, Tinna Stevnsner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The Aging Stress Response and Its Implication for AMD Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Mitochondrial DNA maintenance: an appraisal.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2015
    Review
  14. Review
  15. DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Aging, and Neurodegeneration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ricardo GredillaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Christian Garm
Tinna Stevnsner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge about the different mechanisms underlying the aging process has increased exponentially in the last decades. The fact that the basic mechanisms involved in the aging process are believed to be universal allows the use of different model systems, from the simplest eukaryotic cells such as fungi to the most complex organisms such as mice or human. As our knowledge on the aging mechanisms in those model systems increases, our understanding of human aging and the potential interventions that we could approach rise significantly. Among the different mechanisms that have been implicated in the aging process, DNA repair is one of the processes which have been suggested to play an important role. Here, we review the latest investigations supporting the role of these mechanisms in the aging process, stressing how beneficial the use of different model systems is. We discuss how human genetic studies as well as several investigations on mammalian models and simpler eukaryotic organisms have contributed to a better understanding of the involvement of DNA repair mechanisms in aging.

Indexed as

AgingDNA RepairModels, BiologicalAging, PrematureAnimalsCell NucleusDNADNA End-Joining RepairDNA Mismatch RepairHumansMitochondriaRecombinational DNA RepairDNA

Identifiers

PMID23050036
PMCPMC3462412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.