Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23049875›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

qpure: A tool to estimate tumor cellularity from genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism profiles.

Sarah Song, Katia Nones, David Miller, Ivon Harliwong, Karin S Kassahn, Mark Pinese, Marina Pajic, Anthony J Gill, Amber L Johns, Matthew Anderson and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. BeyondmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The landscape of NNature genetics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Sarah SongQueensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. s.song@imb.uq.edu.au
Katia Nones
David Miller
Ivon Harliwong
Karin S Kassahn
Mark Pinese
Marina Pajic
Anthony J Gill
Amber L Johns
Matthew Anderson
Oliver Holmes
Conrad Leonard
Darrin Taylor
Scott Wood
Qinying Xu
Felicity Newell
Mark J Cowley
Jianmin Wu
Peter Wilson
Lynn Fink
Andrew V Biankin
Nic Waddell
Sean M Grimmond
John V Pearson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour cellularity, the relative proportion of tumour and normal cells in a sample, affects the sensitivity of mutation detection, copy number analysis, cancer gene expression and methylation profiling. Tumour cellularity is traditionally estimated by pathological review of sectioned specimens; however this method is both subjective and prone to error due to heterogeneity within lesions and cellularity differences between the sample viewed during pathological review and tissue used for research purposes. In this paper we describe a statistical model to estimate tumour cellularity from SNP array profiles of paired tumour and normal samples using shifts in SNP allele frequency at regions of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the tumour. We also provide qpure, a software implementation of the method. Our experiments showed that there is a medium correlation 0.42 ([Formula: see text]-value=0.0001) between tumor cellularity estimated by qpure and pathology review. Interestingly there is a high correlation 0.87 ([Formula: see text]-value [Formula: see text] 2.2e-16) between cellularity estimates by qpure and deep Ion Torrent sequencing of known somatic KRAS mutations; and a weaker correlation 0.32 ([Formula: see text]-value=0.004) between IonTorrent sequencing and pathology review. This suggests that qpure may be a more accurate predictor of tumour cellularity than pathology review. qpure can be downloaded from https://sourceforge.net/projects/qpure/.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyExonsGene Expression RegulationGene FrequencyGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLoss of HeterozygosityModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalMutationPancreatic NeoplasmsRegression AnalysisSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID23049875
PMCPMC3457972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.