ArticlePloS one2012
Looking for discriminating is different from looking for looking's sake.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Controlling the trajectory of a moving object substantially shortens the latency of motor responses to visual stimuli.iScience · 2023Article
- Stable Working Memory and Perceptual Representations in Macaque Lateral Prefrontal Cortex during Naturalistic Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Vision as oculomotor reward: cognitive contributions to the dynamic control of saccadic eye movements.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2021Review
- Perception of saccadic reaction time.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Stronger saccadic suppression of displacement and blanking effect in children.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Parametric Covariability in the Standard Model of the Saccadic Main Sequence.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2018Article
- Saccade reaction time asymmetries during task-switching in pursuit tracking.Experimental brain research · 2013Article
- Post-saccadic Eye Movement Indices Under Cognitive Load: A Path Analysis to Determine Visual Performance.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies provide evidence for task-specific influences on saccadic eye movements. For instance, saccades exhibit higher peak velocity when the task requires coordinating eye and hand movements. The current study shows that the need to process task-relevant visual information at the saccade endpoint can be, in itself, sufficient to cause such effects. In this study, participants performed a visual discrimination task which required a saccade for successful completion. We compared the characteristics of these task-related saccades to those of classical target-elicited saccades, which required participants to fixate a visual target without performing a discrimination task. The results show that task-related saccades are faster and initiated earlier than target-elicited saccades. Differences between both saccade types are also noted in their saccade reaction time distributions and their main sequences, i.e., the relationship between saccade velocity, duration, and amplitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.