Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23048194›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal2012

All-cause mortality benefit of coronary revascularization vs. medical therapy in patients without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry).

James K Min, Daniel S Berman, Allison Dunning, Stephan Achenbach, Mouaz Al-Mallah, Matthew J Budoff, Filippo Cademartiri, Tracy Q Callister, Hyuk-Jae Chang, Victor Cheng and 18 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Fractional flow reserve as the standard of reference: All that glistens is not gold.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Diabetes and Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Long-Term Prognostic Value of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2017
    Review
  18. Downstream resource utilization following SPECT: Impact of age and gender.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 20 institutions in 7 countries.

James K MinDepartment of Medicine, Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., S. Taper Building 1258, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA. james.min@cshs.org
Daniel S Berman
Allison Dunning
Stephan Achenbach
Mouaz Al-Mallah
Matthew J Budoff
Filippo Cademartiri
Tracy Q Callister
Hyuk-Jae Chang
Victor Cheng
Kavitha Chinnaiyan
Benjamin J W Chow
Ricardo Cury
Augustin Delago
Gudrun Feuchtner
Martin Hadamitzky
Joerg Hausleiter
Philipp Kaufmann
Ronald P Karlsberg
Yong-Jin Kim
Jonathon Leipsic
Fay Y Lin
Erica Maffei
Fabian Plank
Gilbert Raff
Todd Villines
Troy M Labounty
Leslee J Shaw
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USBeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USDeutsches Herzzentrum München · DEErasmus MC · NLBaptist Hospital of Miami · USCapital Cardiology Associates · USCardiovascular Medical Group · USEmory University · USFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHarbor–UCLA Medical Center · USInnsbruck Medical University · ATNew York Hospital Queens · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USSeoul National University Hospital · KRSeverance Hospital · KRUniversität Innsbruck · ATUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo date, the therapeutic benefit of revascularization vs. medical therapy for stable individuals undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) based upon coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) findings has not been examined. METHODS AND

resultsWe examined 15 223 patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing CCTA from eight sites and six countries who were followed for median 2.1 years (interquartile range 1.4-3.3 years) for an endpoint of all-cause mortality. Obstructive CAD by CCTA was defined as a ≥50% luminal diameter stenosis in a major coronary artery. Patients were categorized as having high-risk CAD vs. non-high-risk CAD, with the former including patients with at least obstructive two-vessel CAD with proximal left anterior descending artery involvement, three-vessel CAD, and left main CAD. Death occurred in 185 (1.2%) patients. Patients were categorized into two treatment groups: revascularization (n = 1103; 2.2% mortality) and medical therapy (n = 14 120, 1.1% mortality). To account for non-randomized referral to revascularization, we created a propensity score developed by logistic regression to identify variables that influenced the decision to refer to revascularization. Within this model (C index 0.92, χ2 = 1248, P < 0.0001), obstructive CAD was the most influential factor for referral, followed by an interaction of obstructive CAD with pre-test likelihood of CAD (P = 0.0344). Within CCTA CAD groups, rates of revascularization increased from 3.8% for non-high-risk CAD to 51.2% high-risk CAD. In multivariable models, when compared with medical therapy, revascularization was associated with a survival advantage for patients with high-risk CAD [hazards ratio (HR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.83], with no difference in survival for patients with non-high-risk CAD (HR 3.24, 95% CI 0.76-13.89) (P-value for interaction = 0.03).

conclusionIn an intermediate-term follow-up, coronary revascularization is associated with a survival benefit in patients with high-risk CAD by CCTA, with no apparent benefit of revascularization in patients with lesser forms of CAD.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiotonic AgentsCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial RevascularizationPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPropensity ScoreCardiotonic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23048194
PMCPMC3598430
OpenAlexW2148814686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.