Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23047588›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2013

Confocal laser scanning microscopy and ultrastructural study of VGLUT2 thalamic input to striatal projection neurons in rats.

Wanlong Lei, Yunping Deng, Bingbing Liu, Shuhua Mu, Natalie M Guley, Ting Wong, Anton Reiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wanlong LeiDepartment of Anatomy, Zhongshan Medical School of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, PR China. leiwl@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Yunping Deng
Bingbing Liu
Shuhua Mu
Natalie M Guley
Ting Wong
Anton Reiner

Funding

PATHOGENETIC MECHANISMS OF HUNTINGTON'S DISEASER01NS028721 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI REINER, ANTON J. · 1990 to 2004
$1.7M
Organization of the Cortical Projection to the Basal GangliaR01NS057722 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI REINER, ANTON J. · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
NEUROPEPTIDE SYSTEMS IN AVIAN AND RETILLIAN BRAINR01NS019620 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI REINER, ANTON J. · 1985 to 2003
$900k
Neuropathology and Pathogenesis of Huntington's DiseaseR56NS028721 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI REINER, ANTON J. · 2008 to 2008
$322k
NINDS NIH HHS NS-19620NINDS NIH HHS NS-28721NINDS NIH HHS NS-57722NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS019620NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS028721NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057722NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS028721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined thalamic input to striatum in rats using immunolabeling for the vesicular glutamate transporter (VGLUT2). Double immunofluorescence viewed with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) revealed that VGLUT2+ terminals are distinct from VGLUT1+ terminals. CLSM of Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHAL)-labeled cortical or thalamic terminals revealed that VGLUT2 is rare in corticostriatal terminals but nearly always present in thalamostriatal terminals. Electron microscopy revealed that VGLUT2+ terminals made up 39.4% of excitatory terminals in striatum (with VGLUT1+ corticostriatal terminals constituting the rest), and 66.8% of VGLUT2+ terminals synapsed on spines and the remainder on dendrites. VGLUT2+ axospinous terminals had a mean diameter of 0.624 μm, while VGLUT2+ axodendritic terminals a mean diameter of 0.698 μm. In tissue in which we simultaneously immunolabeled thalamostriatal terminals for VGLUT2 and striatal neurons for D1 (with about half of spines immunolabeled for D1), 54.6% of VGLUT2+ terminals targeted D1+ spines (i.e., direct pathway striatal neurons), and 37.3% of D1+ spines received VGLUT2+ synaptic contacts. By contrast, 45.4% of VGLUT2+ terminals targeted D1-negative spines (i.e., indirect pathway striatal neurons), and only 25.8% of D1-negative spines received VGLUT2+ synaptic contacts. Similarly, among VGLUT2+ axodendritic synaptic terminals, 59.1% contacted D1+ dendrites, and 40.9% contacted D1-negative dendrites. VGLUT2+ terminals on D1+ spines and dendrites tended to be slightly smaller than those on D1-negative spines and dendrites. Thus, thalamostriatal terminals contact both direct and indirect pathway striatal neurons, with a slight preference for direct. These results are consistent with physiological studies indicating slightly different effects of thalamic input on the two types of striatal projection neurons.

Indexed as

AnimalsCorpus StriatumExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalNeural PathwaysNeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyThalamusVesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 2Slc17a6 protein, ratVesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 2

Identifiers

PMID23047588
PMCPMC4142516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.