ArticleBMC systems biology2012
Integrating many co-splicing networks to reconstruct splicing regulatory modules.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alternative splicing across the C. elegans nervous system.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Transcriptional Networks of Microglia in Alzheimer's Disease and Insights into Pathogenesis.Genes · 2019Review
- Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene-disease predictions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Bioinformatics challenges and perspectives when studying the effect of epigenetic modifications on alternative splicing.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Review
- The determinants of alternative RNA splicing in human cells.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2017Review
- Co-expression networks reveal the tissue-specific regulation of transcription and splicing.Genome research · 2017Article
- Next generation sequencing technology and genomewide data analysis: Perspectives for retinal research.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2016Review
- Integromics network meta-analysis on cardiac aging offers robust multi-layer modular signatures and reveals micronome synergism.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Cosplicing network analysis of mammalian brain RNA-Seq data utilizing WGCNA and Mantel correlations.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Integrative analysis of many RNA-seq datasets to study alternative splicing.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2014Article
- Introduction to sequencing the brain transcriptome.International review of neurobiology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlternative splicing is a ubiquitous gene regulatory mechanism that dramatically increases the complexity of the proteome. However, the mechanism for regulating alternative splicing is poorly understood, and study of coordinated splicing regulation has been limited to individual cases. To study genome-wide splicing regulation, we integrate many human RNA-seq datasets to identify splicing module, which we define as a set of cassette exons co-regulated by the same splicing factors.
resultsWe have designed a tensor-based approach to identify co-splicing clusters that appear frequently across multiple conditions, thus very likely to represent splicing modules - a unit in the splicing regulatory network. In particular, we model each RNA-seq dataset as a co-splicing network, where the nodes represent exons and the edges are weighted by the correlations between exon inclusion rate profiles. We apply our tensor-based method to the 38 co-splicing networks derived from human RNA-seq datasets and indentify an atlas of frequent co-splicing clusters. We demonstrate that these identified clusters represent potential splicing modules by validating against four biological knowledge databases. The likelihood that a frequent co-splicing cluster is biologically meaningful increases with its recurrence across multiple datasets, highlighting the importance of the integrative approach.
conclusionsCo-splicing clusters reveal novel functional groups which cannot be identified by co-expression clusters, particularly they can grant new insights into functions associated with post-transcriptional regulation, and the same exons can dynamically participate in different pathways depending on different conditions and different other exons that are co-spliced. We propose that by identifying splicing module, a unit in the splicing regulatory network can serve as an important step to decipher the splicing code.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.