Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23045659›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Conserved epigenetic sensitivity to early life experience in the rat and human hippocampus.

Matthew Suderman, Patrick O McGowan, Aya Sasaki, Tony C T Huang, Michael T Hallett, Michael J Meaney, Gustavo Turecki, Moshe Szyf

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 320 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Work-Related Stress, Physio-Pathological Mechanisms, and the Influence of Environmental Genetic Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Practitioner Review: Infant mental health meets cell and molecular biology - a look to the future.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew SudermanSackler Program for Epigenetics and Developmental Psychobiology at McGill University, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Patrick O McGowan
Aya Sasaki
Tony C T Huang
Michael T Hallett
Michael J Meaney
Gustavo Turecki
Moshe Szyf
McGill University · CACanadian Institute for Advanced Research · CAUniversity of Toronto · CADouglas Mental Health University Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early life experience is associated with long-term effects on behavior and epigenetic programming of the NR3C1 (GLUCOCORTICOID RECEPTOR) gene in the hippocampus of both rats and humans. However, it is unlikely that such effects completely capture the evolutionarily conserved epigenetic mechanisms of early adaptation to environment. Here we present DNA methylation profiles spanning 6.5 million base pairs centered at the NR3C1 gene in the hippocampus of humans who experienced abuse as children and nonabused controls. We compare these profiles to corresponding DNA methylation profiles in rats that received differential levels of maternal care. The profiles of both species reveal hundreds of DNA methylation differences associated with early life experience distributed across the entire region in nonrandom patterns. For instance, methylation differences tend to cluster by genomic location, forming clusters covering as many as 1 million bases. Even more surprisingly, these differences seem to specifically target regulatory regions such as gene promoters, particularly those of the protocadherin α, β, and γ gene families. Beyond these high-level similarities, more detailed analyses reveal methylation differences likely stemming from the significant biological and environmental differences between species. These results provide support for an analogous cross-species epigenetic regulatory response at the level of the genomic region to early life experience.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsCadherinsChildChild AbuseDNA MethylationEvolution, MolecularGene-Environment InteractionHippocampusHumansLife Change EventsMaleMultigene FamilyRatsReceptors, GlucocorticoidSpecies SpecificityCadherinsNR3C1 protein, humanNR3C1 protein, ratReceptors, Glucocorticoid

Identifiers

PMID23045659
PMCPMC3477392
OpenAlexW2024994042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.