Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23045543›Full record

Trial reportCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2012

Randomized controlled trial of patient navigation for newly diagnosed cancer patients: effects on quality of life.

Samantha Hendren, Jennifer J Griggs, Ronald Epstein, Sharon Humiston, Pascal Jean-Pierre, Paul Winters, Mechelle Sanders, Starlene Loader, Kevin Fiscella

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of patient navigation programs across the entire continuum of breast cancer care: a GRADE-assessed systematic review with meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for colorectal cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Neighborhood factors associated with time to resolution following an abnormal breast or cervical cancer screening test.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  8. Nurse navigators in early cancer care: a randomized, controlled trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. The effect of social care nurses on health related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: A non-randomized, multicenter, controlled trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patients' experience of lung cancer care coordination: a quantitative exploration.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The Role of Patient Navigation on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion and Education: a Review of the Literature.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Review
  17. The "rocky treatment course": identifying a high-risk subgroup of head and neck cancer patients for supportive interventions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  18. Effect of patient navigation on satisfaction with cancer-related care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha HendrenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. hendren@med.umich.edu
Jennifer J Griggs
Ronald Epstein
Sharon Humiston
Pascal Jean-Pierre
Paul Winters
Mechelle Sanders
Starlene Loader
Kevin Fiscella
Children's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity of Rochester · USUniversity of Miami · USHighland Community College - Illinois · US

Funding

RCT of Primary Care-based Patient Navigation-ActivationU01CA116924 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI FISCELLA, KEVIN ANTHONY · 2005 to 2011
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116924NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116924-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient navigation is a promising intervention to ameliorate cancer health disparities. This study objective was to measure patient navigation effects on cancer-specific quality of life (QOL) among patients with newly diagnosed cancer.

methodsA randomized controlled trial of patient navigation was conducted in Rochester, NY. Patients with breast cancer and colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive a patient navigation intervention or usual care. QOL was measured at baseline and four subsequent time points, using the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-B, FACT-C) instruments.

resultsAmong 319 randomized patients (165 patient navigation, 154 control), median age was 57 years and 32.5% were from minority race/ethnicity groups. Patient navigation and control groups were comparable on baseline factors, except home ownership versus renting (more home ownership among controls, P = 0.05) and race (more whites among controls, P = 0.05). Total and subscale FACT scores did not differ between groups when analyzed as a change from baseline to 3 months, or at various time points. The emotional well-being subscale change from baseline approached significance (better change among patient navigation group, P = 0.05). Time trends of QOL measures did not differ significantly between groups. Adjustment for baseline patient factors did not reveal a benefit of patient navigation on QOL.

conclusionsIn this randomized trial of patient navigation, there was no statistically significant effect on disease-specific QOL. IMPACT: These results suggest that patient navigation may not affect QOL during cancer treatment, that social/medical support are adequate in this study's setting, or that the trial failed to target patients likely to experience QOL benefit from patient navigation.

Indexed as

Patient NavigationQuality of LifeAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID23045543
PMCPMC3468902
OpenAlexW2109412760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.