Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23045432›Full record

GuidelineNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2012

A European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines on acute kidney injury: part 1: definitions, conservative management and contrast-induced nephropathy.

Ad-hoc working group of ERBP, Danilo Fliser, Maurice Laville, Adrian Covic, Denis Fouque, Raymond Vanholder, Laurent Juillard, Wim Van Biesen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02920736 (Value of Urine sTREM-1 on Early Predicting Secondary Acute Kidney Injury in Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 234 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
234citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02920736 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Value of Urine sTREM-1 on Early Predicting Secondary Acute Kidney Injury in Sepsis: a Mutilcenter and Prospective Clinical Study

TypeobservationalSponsorChinese PLA General HospitalRan2016 to 2018Enrolled500ConditionsAcute Kidney Injury, Sepsis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

234 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Association between Creatinine Trajectories and All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Patients after Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on MIMIC-IV.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2026
    Article

174 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ad-hoc working group of ERBPDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Danilo Fliser
Maurice Laville
Adrian Covic
Denis Fouque
Raymond Vanholder
Laurent Juillard
Wim Van Biesen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryContrast MediaHumansKidney DiseasesTerminology as TopicContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID23045432
PMCPMC3520085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.