Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23043499›Full record

ArticleCancer investigation2012

Patterns of response in patients with pretreated metastatic melanoma who received ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in a European expanded access program: five illustrative case reports.

Sofie Wilgenhof, Stephanie Du Four, Hendrik Everaert, Bart Neyns

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recommendations to Facilitate Expanded Access to Investigational Therapies for Seriously Ill Patients.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. CTLA4 blockade broadens the peripheral T-cell receptor repertoire.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sofie WilgenhofDepartments of Medical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Stephanie Du Four
Hendrik Everaert
Bart Neyns

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg was the first agent to improve survival of pretreated advanced melanoma patients. Nonconventional response patterns to ipilimumab have been reported widely, but most of these data were from studies with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg. Here, case reports from five patients treated within an expanded access program (EAP) with ipilimumab at its licensed dose of 3 mg/kg illustrate the efficacy of ipilimumab in an expanded access setting and the range of different tumor response patterns encountered. The durable clinical benefit seen in these patients despite the observed atypical response patterns highlights the necessity for comprehensive clinical decision making.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsEuropeFemaleHumansIpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedSalvage TherapySkin NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsIpilimumab

Identifiers

PMID23043499
PMCPMC3536036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.