Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013
Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a human anti-interleukin-13 monoclonal antibody (CNTO 5825) in an ascending single-dose first-in-human study.
Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Mechanistic modeling of a human IgGCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022Article
- Estimation of Clearance and Bioavailability of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies from Only Subcutaneous Injection Data in Humans Based on Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Data.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2021Article
- A Mechanistic Site-Of-Action Model: A Tool for Informing Right Target, Right Compound, And Right Dose for Therapeutic Antagonistic Antibody Programs.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Simple Approach to Accurately Predict Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies after Subcutaneous Injection in Humans.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and immunogenicity of CNTO 5825 following single-dose intravenous (i.v.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) administration in healthy and healthy atopic subjects.
methodsSixty-four subjects received a single dose of placebo or CNTO 5825 (0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, or 10 mg kg(-1) i.v. in a dose-escalating manner, or 3.0 mg kg(-1) s.c. in healthy subjects; and 10 mg kg(-1) i.v. in healthy atopic subjects). Subjects were observed for 96 h postadministration and followed for 16 weeks. Safety and tolerability were monitored, and serum samples were collected to measure CNTO 5825 concentrations, antibodies to CNTO 5825 and PD biomarkers.
resultsMost adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and considered to be unrelated to CNTO 5825, with no dose-dependent trends seen. The two serious adverse events were considered to be unrelated to CNTO 5825. After i.v. administration, CNTO 5825 exhibited linear PK, with a terminal half-life of ∼22-32 days. After a single 3 mg kg(-1) s.c. dose in healthy subjects, CNTO 5825 was absorbed into the systemic circulation with a median time to maximum serum concentration (tmax) of 5.45 days and absolute bioavailability of ∼75%. The PK profile of CNTO 5825 at 10 mg kg(-1) was similar in both healthy and healthy atopic subjects. No antibodies to CNTO 5825 were detected through week 16. In the CNTO 5825-treated healthy atopic subjects, there was a significant reduction in serum IgE and C-C motif chemokine ligand 17 (P = 0.028 and 0.068 vs. placebo, respectively).
conclusionsCNTO 5825 was well tolerated, had an acceptable safety profile, exhibited linear PK characteristics, and no detected antibodies to CNTO 5825.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.