ArticleBMC genomics2012
Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.
Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Meta-Assembly of Selection Signatures in Cattle.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Establishment and validation of porcine embryo genomic selection system through SCNT technique.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Genotyping errors can affect indirect predictions of young selection candidates: A simulation study.JDS communications · 2026Article
- The Donkey Genome: From Evolutionary Insights to Sustainable Breeding Strategies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Sequence-based GWAS in 180,000 German Holstein cattle reveals new candidate variants for milk production traits.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Validation of selection signatures for coat color in the Podolica Italiana gray cattle breed.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Whole-Genome Sequence Imputation Strategies in Korean Hanwoo Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a horse reference panel for genotype imputation.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Article
- Inference of Ancestries and Heterozygosity Proportion and Genotype Imputation in West African Cattle Populations.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Evaluation of imputation accuracy using the combination of two high-density panels in Nelore beef cattle.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Accuracy of genotype imputation in Labrador Retrievers.Animal genetics · 2018Article
- Which Individuals To Choose To Update the Reference Population? Minimizing the Loss of Genetic Diversity in Animal Genomic Selection Programs.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- Genomic Selection in Aquaculture: Application, Limitations and Opportunities With Special Reference to Marine Shrimp and Pearl Oysters.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
- Genome-wide association studies of fertility and calving traits in Brown Swiss cattle using imputed whole-genome sequences.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.BMC genetics · 2017Article
- Evaluation of the accuracy of imputed sequence variant genotypes and their utility for causal variant detection in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2017Article
- Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.BMC genetics · 2017Article
- Predictive performance of genomic selection methods for carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle: impacts of the genetic architecture.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe investigated strategies and factors affecting accuracy of imputing genotypes from lower-density SNP panels (Illumina 3K, 7K, Affymetrix 15K and 25K, and evenly spaced subsets) up to one medium (Illumina 50K) and one high-density (Illumina 800K) SNP panel. We also evaluated the utility of imputed genotypes on the accuracy of genomic selection using Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle data from 2727 and 845 animals genotyped with 50K and 800K SNP chip, respectively. Animals were divided into reference and test sets (genotyped with higher and lower density SNP panels, respectively) for evaluating the accuracies of imputation. For the accuracy of genomic selection, a comparison of direct genetic values (DGV) was made by dividing the data into training and validation sets under a range of imputation scenarios.
resultsOf the three methods compared for imputation, IMPUTE2 outperformed Beagle and fastPhase for almost all scenarios. Higher SNP densities in the test animals, larger reference sets and higher relatedness between test and reference animals increased the accuracy of imputation. 50K specific genotypes were imputed with moderate allelic error rates from 15K (2.85%) and 25K (2.75%) genotypes. Using IMPUTE2, SNP genotypes up to 800K were imputed with low allelic error rate (0.79% genome-wide) from 50K genotypes, and with moderate error rate from 3K (4.78%) and 7K (2.00%) genotypes. The error rate of imputing up to 800K from 3K or 7K was further reduced when an additional middle tier of 50K genotypes was incorporated in a 3-tiered framework. Accuracies of DGV for five production traits using imputed 50K genotypes were close to those obtained with the actual 50K genotypes and higher compared to using 3K or 7K genotypes. The loss in accuracy of DGV was small when most of the training animals also had imputed (50K) genotypes. Additional gains in DGV accuracies were small when SNP densities increased from 50K to imputed 800K.
conclusionPopulation-based genotype imputation can be used to predict and combine genotypes from different low, medium and high-density SNP chips with a high level of accuracy. Imputing genotypes from low-density SNP panels to at least 50K SNP density increases the accuracy of genomic selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.