Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23043124›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Using rule-based natural language processing to improve disease normalization in biomedical text.

Ning Kang, Bharat Singh, Zubair Afzal, Erik M van Mulligen, Jan A Kors

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PromptLink: Leveraging Large Language Models for Cross-Source Biomedical Concept Linking.International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Annual International ACMSIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Multitask Deep Learning Framework for DNER.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Recent advances in biomedical literature mining.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Normalizing Adverse Events using Recurrent Neural Networks with Attention.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  17. BERT-based Ranking for Biomedical Entity Normalization.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Literature-based automated discovery of tumor suppressor p53 phosphorylation and inhibition by NEK2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ning KangDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bharat Singh
Zubair Afzal
Erik M van Mulligen
Jan A Kors

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIn order for computers to extract useful information from unstructured text, a concept normalization system is needed to link relevant concepts in a text to sources that contain further information about the concept. Popular concept normalization tools in the biomedical field are dictionary-based. In this study we investigate the usefulness of natural language processing (NLP) as an adjunct to dictionary-based concept normalization.

methodsWe compared the performance of two biomedical concept normalization systems, MetaMap and Peregrine, on the Arizona Disease Corpus, with and without the use of a rule-based NLP module. Performance was assessed for exact and inexact boundary matching of the system annotations with those of the gold standard and for concept identifier matching.

resultsWithout the NLP module, MetaMap and Peregrine attained F-scores of 61.0% and 63.9%, respectively, for exact boundary matching, and 55.1% and 56.9% for concept identifier matching. With the aid of the NLP module, the F-scores of MetaMap and Peregrine improved to 73.3% and 78.0% for boundary matching, and to 66.2% and 69.8% for concept identifier matching. For inexact boundary matching, performances further increased to 85.5% and 85.4%, and to 73.6% and 73.3% for concept identifier matching.

conclusionsWe have shown the added value of NLP for the recognition and normalization of diseases with MetaMap and Peregrine. The NLP module is general and can be applied in combination with any concept normalization system. Whether its use for concept types other than disease is equally advantageous remains to be investigated.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingTerminology as TopicDiseaseHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalUnified Medical Language SystemVocabulary, ControlledBiomedical concept identificationDictionary-based systemNatural language processingRule-based systemText mining

Identifiers

PMID23043124
PMCPMC3756254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.