Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23042885›Full record

ReviewScience (New York, N.Y.)2012

Depression and hippocampal neurogenesis: a road to remission?

Amelia J Eisch, David Petrik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 235 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
235citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

235 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Genetics and Neurobiology of Treatment-Resistant Depression-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Anti-RGMa neutralizing antibody ameliorates vascular cognitive impairment in mice.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article

175 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amelia J EischDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9070, USA. amelia.eisch@utsouthwestern.edu
David Petrik

Funding

Regulation of adult neurogenesis by opiatesR01DA016765 · NIDA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI EISCH, AMELIA J · 2004 to 2013
$4.0M
New Horizons in Adult NeurogenesisK02DA023555 · NIDA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI EISCH, AMELIA J · 2007 to 2017
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA023555NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult-generated hippocampal neurons are required for mood control and antidepressant efficacy, raising hopes that someday we can harness the power of new neurons to treat mood disorders such as depression. However, conflicting findings from preclinical research--involving stress, depression, and neurogenesis--highlight the complexity of considering neurogenesis as a road to remission from depression. To reconcile differences in the literature, we introduce the "neurogenic interactome," a platform from which to consider the diverse and dynamic factors regulating neurogenesis. We propose consideration of the varying perspectives--system, region, and local regulation of neurogenesis--offered by the interactome and exchange of ideas between the fields of learning and memory and mood disorder research to clarify the role of neurogenesis in the etiology and treatment of depression.

Indexed as

NeurogenesisAnimalsHippocampusHumansLearningMajor Depressive DisorderMemoryMiceMice, TransgenicNeurons

Identifiers

PMID23042885
PMCPMC3756889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.