Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23042513›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of pathology2013

The microbiome in wound repair and tissue fibrosis.

Brittan S Scales, Gary B Huffnagle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Host-Microbiome Crosstalk in Chronic Wound Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Wound Microbiota and Its Impact on Wound Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Advanced therapeutics · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brittan S ScalesDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Gary B Huffnagle

Funding

University of Michigan Center for Gastrointestinal ResearchP30DK034933 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WILEY, JOHN W · 1986 to 2021
$22.5M
The Interplay Between Host Immunity and Clostridium difficile PathogenesisU19AI090871 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ARONOFF, DAVID M · 2010 to 2014
$7.5M
Molecular Mechanisms of Microbial Pathogenesis Training ProgramT32AI007528 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CARRUTHERS, VERNON BRUCE · 1998 to 2024
$6.8M
Pulmonary bacterial microbiome-epithelial cell interactions in COPDR01HL114447 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HUFFNAGLE, GARY B, MARTINEZ, FERNANDO J · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
The Role of the Microbiome in the Development/Prevention of Food AllergiesR21AI087869 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HUFFNAGLE, GARY B · 2010 to 2011
$424k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114447NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL114447NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI087869NIAID NIH HHS R21AI087869NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007528NIAID NIH HHS T32AI007528NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI090871NIAID NIH HHS U19AI090871NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034933NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK034933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial colonization occurs in all wounds, chronic or acute, and the break in epithelium integrity that defines a wound impairs the forces that shape and constrain the microbiome at that site. This review highlights the interactions between bacterial communities in the wound and the ultimate resolution of the wound or development of fibrotic lesions. Chronic wounds support complex microbial communities comprising a wide variety of bacterial phyla, genera, and species, including some fastidious anaerobic bacteria not identified using culture-based methods. Thus, the complexity of bacterial communities in wounds has historically been underestimated. There are a number of intriguing possibilities to explain these results that may also provide novel insights into changes and adaptation of bacterial metabolic networks in inflamed and wounded mucosa, including the critical role of biofilm formation. It is well accepted that the heightened state of activation of host cells in a wound that is driven by the microbiota can certainly lead to detrimental effects on wound regeneration, but the microbiota of the wound may also have beneficial effects on wound healing. Studies in experimental systems have clearly demonstrated a beneficial effect for members of the gut microbiota on regulation of systemic inflammation, which could also impact wound healing at sites outside the gastrointestinal tract. The utilization of culture-independent microbiology to characterize the microbiome of wounds and surrounding mucosa has raised many intriguing questions regarding previously held notions about the cause and effect relationships between bacterial colonization and wound repair and mechanisms involved in this symbiotic relationship.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaMetagenomeWound HealingAnimalsBiofilmsFibrosisGastrointestinal TractHumansSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID23042513
PMCPMC3631561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.