Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23042185›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2012

Prevalence, environmental loading, and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia isolates from domestic and wild animals along the Central California Coast.

Stori C Oates, Melissa A Miller, Dane Hardin, Patricia A Conrad, Ann Melli, David A Jessup, Clare Dominik, Annette Roug, M Tim Tinker, Woutrina A Miller

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Synthesis ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  5. Efficacy of medicinal plants in cryptosporidiosis treatment: a comprehensive review.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Helminths and protozoan parasites in common opossums (Didelphis marsupialis) in a suburban area in Medellín, Colombia.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2025
    Article
  8. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  9. Domesticated animal reservoirs ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Article
  10. Assessment of potential zoonotic transmission ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparative molecular analysis of fecal microbiota of bobcats (Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2019
    Article
  20. Relationships between Microbial Indicators and Pathogens in Recreational Water Settings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stori C OatesDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Melissa A Miller
Dane Hardin
Patricia A Conrad
Ann Melli
David A Jessup
Clare Dominik
Annette Roug
M Tim Tinker
Woutrina A Miller
University of California, Davis · USCalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife · USWestern Ecological Research Center

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The risk of disease transmission from waterborne protozoa is often dependent on the origin (e.g., domestic animals versus wildlife), overall parasite load in contaminated waterways, and parasite genotype, with infections being linked to runoff or direct deposition of domestic animal and wildlife feces. Fecal samples collected from domestic animals and wildlife along the central California coast were screened to (i) compare the prevalence and associated risk factors for fecal shedding of Cryptosporidium and Giardia species parasites, (ii) evaluate the relative importance of animal host groups that contribute to pathogen loading in coastal ecosystems, and (iii) characterize zoonotic and host-specific genotypes. Overall, 6% of fecal samples tested during 2007 to 2010 were positive for Cryptosporidium oocysts and 15% were positive for Giardia cysts. Animal host group and age class were significantly associated with detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia parasites in animal feces. Fecal loading analysis revealed that infected beef cattle potentially contribute the greatest parasite load relative to other host groups, followed by wild canids. Beef cattle, however, shed host-specific, minimally zoonotic Cryptosporidium and Giardia duodenalis genotypes, whereas wild canids shed potentially zoonotic genotypes, including G. duodenalis assemblages A and B. Given that the parasite genotypes detected in cattle were not zoonotic, the public health risk posed by protozoan parasite shedding in cattle feces may be lower than that posed by other animals, such as wild canids, that routinely shed zoonotic genotypes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildCaliforniaCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumDNA, ProtozoanFecesGenotypeGiardia lambliaGiardiasisMolecular Sequence DataPrevalenceSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID23042185
PMCPMC3502930
OpenAlexW1981197398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.