Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23041722›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2013

Improving efficiency and sensitivity: European Research Initiative in CLL (ERIC) update on the international harmonised approach for flow cytometric residual disease monitoring in CLL.

A C Rawstron, S Böttcher, R Letestu, N Villamor, C Fazi, H Kartsios, R M de Tute, J Shingles, M Ritgen, C Moreno and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 199 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Minimal Residual Disease Dynamics after Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab Treatment: Extended Off-Treatment Follow-up From the Randomized CLL14 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Clinical Flow Cytometric Testing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

A C RawstronHMDS, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK. andy.rawstron@hmds.org.uk
S Böttcher
R Letestu
N Villamor
C Fazi
H Kartsios
R M de Tute
J Shingles
M Ritgen
C Moreno
K Lin
A R Pettitt
M Kneba
E Montserrat
F Cymbalista
M Hallek
P Hillmen
P Ghia
European Research Initiative in CLL
University of Lübeck · DEConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHospital de Sant Pau · ESIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITSorbonne Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Cologne · DEVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is becoming increasingly important as treatments improve. An internationally harmonised four-colour (CLR) flow cytometry MRD assay is widely used but has limitations. The aim of this study was to improve MRD analysis by identifying situations where a less time-consuming CD19/CD5/κ/λ analysis would be sufficient for detecting residual CLL, and develop a six-CLR antibody panel that is more efficient for cases requiring full MRD analysis. In 784 samples from CLL patients after treatment, it was possible to determine CD19/CD5/κ/λ thresholds that identified cases with detectable MRD with 100% positive predictive value (PPV). However, CD19/CD5/κ/λ analysis was unsuitable for predicting iwCLL/NCI response status or identifying cases with no detectable MRD. For the latter cases requiring a full MRD assessment, a six-CLR assay was designed comprising CD19/CD5/CD20 with (1) CD3/CD38/CD79b and (2) CD81/CD22/CD43. There was good correlation between four-CLR and six-CLR panels in dilution studies and clinical samples, with 100% concordance for detection of residual disease at the 0.01% (10(-4)) level (n=59) and good linearity even at the 0.001-0.01% (10(-5)-10(-4)) level. A six-CLR panel therefore provides equivalent results to the four-CLR panel but it requires fewer reagents, fewer cells and a much simpler analysis approach.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorEuropeFlow CytometryHumansImmunoglobulin kappa-ChainsImmunoglobulin lambda-ChainsImmunoglobulin Light ChainsImmunophenotypingLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorImmunoglobulin kappa-ChainsImmunoglobulin lambda-ChainsImmunoglobulin Light Chains

Identifiers

PMID23041722
OpenAlexW2022401246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.