Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23041721›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2013

Xenograft models of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: problems, pitfalls and future directions.

M T S Bertilaccio, C Scielzo, G Simonetti, E Ten Hacken, B Apollonio, P Ghia, F Caligaris-Cappio

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. TheFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M T S BertilaccioSan Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
C Scielzo
G Simonetti
E Ten Hacken
B Apollonio
P Ghia
F Caligaris-Cappio
San Raffaele University of Rome · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenotransplantation of human tumor cells into immunodeficient mice has been a powerful preclinical tool in several hematological malignancies, with the notable exception of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). For several decades, this possibility was hampered by the inefficient and/or short-term engrafment of CLL cells into available animals. The development of new generations of immunocompromised mice has allowed to partially overcome these constraints. Novel humanized animal models have been created that allow to recapitulate the pathogenesis of the disease and the complex in vivo relationships between leukemic cells and the microenvironment. In this review we discuss the development of xenograft models of CLL, how they may help elucidating the mechanisms that account for the natural history of the disease and facilitating the design of novel therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMiceTransplantation, HeterologousXenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Identifiers

PMID23041721
OpenAlexW2091411465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.