Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23040422›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2012

Screening for type 2 diabetes and population mortality over 10 years (ADDITION-Cambridge): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Rebecca K Simmons, Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui, Stephen J Sharp, Lincoln A Sargeant, Kate M Williams, A Toby Prevost, Ann Louise Kinmonth, Nicholas J Wareham, Simon J Griffin

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 255 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Atencion primaria · 2018
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Screening and Preventive Practice Recommendations from the CIBMTR and EBMT.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2016
    Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Screening with urinary dipsticks for reducing morbidity and mortality.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Recommendations on screening for type 2 diabetes in adults.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2012
    Guideline
  11. Guideline
  12. Behaviour change, weight loss and remission of Type 2 diabetes: a community-based prospective cohort study.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2020
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Glucose challenge test screening for prediabetes and early diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2017
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca K SimmonsMRC Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui
Stephen J Sharp
Lincoln A Sargeant
Kate M Williams
A Toby Prevost
Ann Louise Kinmonth
Nicholas J Wareham
Simon J Griffin
MRC Epidemiology Unit · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 08/116/300Department of Health RP-PG-0606-1259Medical Research Council G0001164Medical Research Council G0200391Medical Research Council MC_U106179471Medical Research Council MC_U106179474Wellcome Trust G061895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes poses a major public health challenge. Population-based screening and early treatment for type 2 diabetes could reduce this growing burden. However, uncertainty persists around the benefits of screening for type 2 diabetes. We assessed the effect of a population-based stepwise screening programme on mortality.

methodsIn a pragmatic parallel group, cluster-randomised trial, 33 general practices in eastern England were randomly assigned by the method of minimisation in an unbalanced design to: screening followed by intensive multifactorial treatment for people diagnosed with diabetes (n=15); screening plus routine care of diabetes according to national guidelines (n=13); and a no-screening control group (n=5). The study population consisted of 20,184 individuals aged 40-69 years (mean 58 years), at high risk of prevalent undiagnosed diabetes, on the basis of a previously validated risk score. In screening practices, individuals were invited to a stepwise programme including random capillary blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) tests, a fasting capillary blood glucose test, and a confirmatory oral glucose tolerance test. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. All participants were flagged for mortality surveillance by the England and Wales Office of National Statistics. Analysis was by intention-to-screen and compared all-cause mortality rates between screening and control groups. This study is registered, number ISRCTN86769081.

findingsOf 16,047 high-risk individuals in screening practices, 15,089 (94%) were invited for screening during 2001-06, 11,737 (73%) attended, and 466 (3%) were diagnosed with diabetes. 4137 control individuals were followed up. During 184,057 person-years of follow up (median duration 9·6 years [IQR 8·9-9·9]), there were 1532 deaths in the screening practices and 377 in control practices (mortality hazard ratio [HR] 1·06, 95% CI 0·90-1·25). We noted no significant reduction in cardiovascular (HR 1·02, 95% CI 0·75-1·38), cancer (1·08, 0·90-1·30), or diabetes-related mortality (1·26, 0·75-2·10) associated with invitation to screening.

interpretationIn this large UK sample, screening for type 2 diabetes in patients at increased risk was not associated with a reduction in all-cause, cardiovascular, or diabetes-related mortality within 10 years. The benefits of screening might be smaller than expected and restricted to individuals with detectable disease.

fundingWellcome Trust; UK Medical Research Council; National Health Service research and development support; UK National Institute for Health Research; University of Aarhus, Denmark; Bio-Rad.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood GlucoseCardiovascular DiseasesCluster AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EnglandFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucose Tolerance TestGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasmsBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID23040422
PMCPMC3607818
OpenAlexW2163202048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.