Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23040221›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2013

Quality Research in Radiation Oncology analysis of clinical performance measures in the management of gastric cancer.

Karyn A Goodman, Najma Khalid, Lisa A Kachnic, Bruce D Minsky, Cheryl Crozier, Jean B Owen, Phillip M Devlin, Charles R Thomas

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karyn A GoodmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA. goodmank@mskcc.org
Najma Khalid
Lisa A Kachnic
Bruce D Minsky
Cheryl Crozier
Jean B Owen
Phillip M Devlin
Charles R Thomas

Funding

RADIATION THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP-STATISTICAL UNIT GRANTU10CA032115 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI SADEK, RAMSES · 1985 to 2008
$9.4M
QUALITY RESEARCH IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY: ACR PCSR01CA065435 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI WILSON, JESSE FRANK · 1994 to 2009
$5.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA065435NCI NIH HHS R01 CA065435NCI NIH HHS U10 CA032115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe specific aim was to determine national patterns of radiation therapy (RT) practice in patients treated for stage IB-IV (nonmetastatic) gastric cancer (GC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A national process survey of randomly selected US RT facilities was conducted which retrospectively assessed demographics, staging, geographic region, practice setting, and treatment by using on-site record review of eligible GC cases treated from 2005 to 2007. Three clinical performance measures (CPMs), (1) use of computed tomography (CT)-based treatment planning; (2) use of dose volume histograms (DVHs) to evaluate RT dose to the kidneys and liver; and (3) completion of RT within the prescribed time frame; and emerging quality indicators, (i) use of intensity modulated RT (IMRT); (ii) use of image-guided tools (IGRT) other than CT for RT target delineation; and (iii) use of preoperative RT, were assessed.

resultsCPMs were computed for 250 eligible patients at 45 institutions (median age, 62 years; 66% male; 60% Caucasian). Using 2000 American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria, 13% of patients were stage I, 29% were stage II, 32% were stage IIIA, 10% were stage IIIB, and 12% were stage IV. Most patients (43%) were treated at academic centers, 32% were treated at large nonacademic centers, and 25% were treated at small to medium sized facilities. Almost all patients (99.5%) underwent CT-based planning, and 75% had DVHs to evaluate normal tissue doses to the kidneys and liver. Seventy percent of patients completed RT within the prescribed time frame. IMRT and IGRT were used in 22% and 17% of patients, respectively. IGRT techniques included positron emission tomography (n=20), magnetic resonance imaging (n=1), respiratory gating and 4-dimensional CT (n=22), and on-board imaging (n=10). Nineteen percent of patients received preoperative RT.

conclusionsThis analysis of radiation practice patterns for treating nonmetastatic GC indicates widespread adoption of CT-based planning with use of DVH to evaluate normal tissue doses. Most patients completed adjuvant RT in the prescribed time frame. IMRT and IGRT were not routinely incorporated into clinical practice during the 2005-2007 period. These data will be a benchmark for future Quality Research in Radiation Oncology GC surveys.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceQuality Indicators, Health CareAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCancer Care FacilitiesFemaleFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHumansKidneyLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID23040221
PMCPMC3545084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.