Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23039441›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2012

Opposing and following vocal responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: evidence for different mechanisms of voice pitch control.

Roozbeh Behroozmand, Oleg Korzyukov, Lindsey Sattler, Charles R Larson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Do Not Cut Off Your Tail: A Mega-Analysis of Responses to Auditory Perturbation Experiments.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Relation of Articulatory and Vocal Auditory-Motor Control in Typical Speakers.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Auditory-Motor Perturbations of Voice Fundamental Frequency: Feedback Delay and Amplification.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roozbeh BehroozmandSpeech Physiology Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA.
Oleg Korzyukov
Lindsey Sattler
Charles R Larson

Funding

Sensory Mechanisms of Voice ControlR01DC006243 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LARSON, CHARLES R · 2004 to 2013
$4.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS 1R01 DC006243NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study describes a technique for analysis of vocal responses to auditory feedback pitch perturbations in which individual trials are first sorted according to response direction and then separately averaged in groups of upward or downward responses. In experiment 1, the stimulus direction was predictable (all upward) but magnitude was randomized between +100, +200, or +500 cents (unpredictable). Results showed that pitch-shift stimuli (PSS) of +100 and +200 cents elicited significantly larger opposing (compensatory) responses than +500 cent stimuli, but no such effect was observed for "following" responses. In experiment 2, subjects were tested in three blocks of trials where for the first two, PSS magnitude and direction were predictable (block 1+100 and block 2-100 cents), and in block 3, the magnitude was predictable (±100 cents) but direction was randomized (upward or downward). Results showed there were slightly more opposing than following responses for predictable PSS direction, but randomized directions led to significantly more opposing than following responses. Results suggest that predictability of stimulus direction and magnitude can modulate vocal responses to feedback pitch perturbations. The function and causes of the opposing and following responses are unknown, but there may be two different neural mechanisms involved in their production.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalPitch PerceptionSpeech AcousticsVoice QualityAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceFemaleHumansMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSound LocalizationSound SpectrographySpeech Production MeasurementTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23039441
PMCPMC3477187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.