Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23039180›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2012

Picture-based memory impairment screen for dementia.

Joe Verghese, Mohan L Noone, Beena Johnson, Anne F Ambrose, Cuiling Wang, Herman Buschke, Vayyattu G Pradeep, Kizhakkaniyakath Abdul Salam, Kunnukatil S Shaji, Pavagada S Mathuranath

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Remote and Cross-Cultural Training of Research Assistants Abroad to Conduct Neuropsychological Tests: Lessons Learned.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Correlates and Brain Substrates of Happiness in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in India.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joe VergheseDepartment of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA. joe.verghese@einstein.yu.edu
Mohan L Noone
Beena Johnson
Anne F Ambrose
Cuiling Wang
Herman Buschke
Vayyattu G Pradeep
Kizhakkaniyakath Abdul Salam
Kunnukatil S Shaji
Pavagada S Mathuranath

Funding

Kerala-Einstein Study: Healthy lifestyle, vascular disease, and cognitive declineR01AG039330 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI MATHURANATH, PAVAGADA S, VERGHESE, JOE · 2011 to 2023
$5.0M
Kerala-Einstein study: Risk factors for cognitive declineR21AG029799 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI VERGHESE, JOE · 2008 to 2009
$245k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039330NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039330-01NIA NIH HHS R21 AG029799NIA NIH HHS R21AG029799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate a picture-based memory impairment screen (PMIS) for the detection of dementia.

designCross-sectional.

settingOutpatient clinics, Baby Memorial Hospital, Kozhikode city in the southern Indian state of Kerala.

participantsThree hundred four community-residing adults aged 55 to 94 with a mean education level of 8 years; 65 were diagnosed with dementia. MEASUREMENTS: PMIS: a culture-fair picture-based cognitive screen designed to be administered by nonspecialists. Diagnostic accuracy estimates (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive power) of PMIS cut-scores in detecting dementia (range 0-8).

resultsPMIS scores were worse in participants with dementia (1.5) than in controls (7.7, P < .001). At the optimal cut-score of 5, PMIS had a sensitivity of 95.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 90.3-100.0%) and a specificity of 99.2% (95% CI = 98.0-100.0%) for detecting dementia. In the 167 participants with <10 years of education, PMIS scores of five or less had a sensitivity of 97.8% (95% CI = 93.6-100.0%) and specificity of 99.2% (95% CI = 97.6-100.0%). The PMIS had better specificity than the Mini-Mental State Examination in detecting dementia, especially in older adults with low education.

conclusionThe PMIS is a brief and reliable screen for dementia in elderly populations with variable literacy rates.

Indexed as

AgedCross-Sectional StudiesDementiaDiagnostic Techniques, NeurologicalFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersPhotographyProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID23039180
PMCPMC3679906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.