Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23038884›Full record

ArticlePuerto Rico health sciences journal2012

Association between vitamin D levels and blood pressure in a group of Puerto Ricans.

Yajaira Caro, Verónica Negrón, Cristina Palacios

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Puerto Rico health sciences journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with primary hypertension: a study from south India.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Vitamin D status and hypertension: a review.Integrated blood pressure control · 2015
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yajaira CaroMaster of Science in Clinical Laboratory Program, School of Health Professions, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Verónica Negrón
Cristina Palacios
University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus · PR

Funding

SUPPLEMENT FOR RENOVATION OF ANIMAL FACILITIES AT INSTITUTE OF NEUROBIOLOGYG12RR003051 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI RODRIGUEZ, RAMONA · 1986 to 2011
$28.1M
TRANSLATIONAL PROTEOMICS CENTERG12MD007600 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI FERNANDEZ-REPOLLET, EMMA · 2012 to 2016
$11.0M
NCRR NIH HHS G12 RR003051NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHypertension is a global public health problem. The apparent association between vitamin D (VitD) and blood pressure (BP) has been studied in several populations but not in a Puerto Rican population. Therefore, we determined the association between serum 25(OH)D levels and BP in a convenience sample in Puerto Rico.

methodsA cross-sectional study of patients attending a local laboratory with an order for serum 25(OH)D levels was performed. Participants completed a questionnaire that solicited the following information: age, sex, weight, height, VitD intake, and history of both sun exposure and hypertension. BP was measured by a phlebotomist on-site and classified according to the Joint National Committee; serum 25(OH)D levels were taken from the record, and VitD status was classified as either optimal (25(OH)D > or = 30 ng/dl) or non-optimal (< 30 ng/dl). Mean, standard deviation, and percentiles were used for descriptive analysis. VitD status and BP were compared by gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) using ANOVA or chi-square. The association between VitD status and blood pressure was assessed by polytomous logistic regression adjusting for several variables.

resultsTwo hundred nineteen individuals were included in the analysis; most were females aged 21 to 50 years who were overweight/obese; 53% of the total population was pre-hypertensive or hypertensive; 60% had non-optimal VitD status; and the sun exposure index was 19.6. No significant associations were found between VitD status and blood pressure after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, total VitD intake, and solar exposure index.

conclusionVitD status was not found to be associated with blood pressure in this sample population; more studies with a larger sample population are needed to determine whether such an association does in fact exist.

Indexed as

Blood PressureAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPuerto RicoVitamin DYoung AdultVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID23038884
PMCPMC3700354
OpenAlexW1543537595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.