Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23037712›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2012

Bevacizumab continuation beyond initial bevacizumab progression among recurrent glioblastoma patients.

D A Reardon, J E Herndon, K B Peters, A Desjardins, A Coan, E Lou, A L Sumrall, S Turner, E S Lipp, S Sathornsumetee and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A comprehensive analysis of factors related to carmustine/bevacizumab response in recurrent glioblastoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. New Directions in Anti-Angiogenic Therapy for Glioblastoma.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

D A ReardonDepartment of Surgery, The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, 200 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA. dreardon3@partners.org
J E Herndon
K B Peters
A Desjardins
A Coan
E Lou
A L Sumrall
S Turner
E S Lipp
S Sathornsumetee
J N Rich
J H Sampson
A H Friedman
S T Boulton
D D Bigner
H S Friedman
J J Vredenburgh
Duke University Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USDuke University · USPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation · USSiriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES IN HUMAN MEDULLOBLASTOMAP50NS020023 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BIGNER, DARELL D · 1985 to 2013
$17.3M
BRAIN TUMORS: IMMUNOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL STUDIESR37CA011898 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BIGNER, DARELL D · 1988 to 2012
$8.1M
NCI NIH HHS 5 R37 CA11898NCI NIH HHS R37 CA011898NCRR NIH HHS MO1 RR 30NINDS NIH HHS 5P50-NS-20023NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS020023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBevacizumab improves outcome for most recurrent glioblastoma patients, but the duration of benefit is limited and survival after initial bevacizumab progression is poor. We evaluated bevacizumab continuation beyond initial progression among recurrent glioblastoma patients as it is a common, yet unsupported practice in some countries.

methodsWe analysed outcome among all patients (n=99) who received subsequent therapy after progression on one of five consecutive, single-arm, phase II clinical trials evaluating bevacizumab regimens for recurrent glioblastoma. Of note, the five trials contained similar eligibility, treatment and assessment criteria, and achieved comparable outcome.

resultsThe median overall survival (OS) and OS at 6 months for patients who continued bevacizumab therapy (n=55) were 5.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4, 7.6) and 49.2% (95% CI: 35.2, 61.8), compared with 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.1, 5.4) and 29.5% (95% CI: 17.0, 43.2) for patients treated with a non-bevacizumab regimen (n=44; P=0.014). Bevacizumab continuation was an independent predictor of improved OS (hazard ratio=0.64; P=0.04).

conclusionThe results of our retrospective pooled analysis suggest that bevacizumab continuation beyond initial progression modestly improves survival compared with available non-bevacizumab therapy for recurrent glioblastoma patients require evaluation in an appropriately randomised, prospective trial.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleGlioblastomaHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumab

Identifiers

PMID23037712
PMCPMC3493761
OpenAlexW2026827454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.