Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23036343›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2012

Regeneration of the elbow joint in the developing chick embryo recapitulates development.

B Duygu Özpolat, Mariana Zapata, John Daniel Frugé, Jeffrey Coote, Jangwoo Lee, Ken Muneoka, Rosalie Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B Duygu ÖzpolatDivision of Developmental Biology, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.
Mariana Zapata
John Daniel Frugé
Jeffrey Coote
Jangwoo Lee
Ken Muneoka
Rosalie Anderson
Loyola University New Orleans · USTulane University · US

Funding

MSX2 AND DLX-5 IN LIMB PATTERN FORMATION AND CARTILAGE DIFFERENTIATIONP01HD022610 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI MUNEOKA, KEN · 1988 to 2009
$6.7M
Regeneration of the Developing Chick Elbow JointR15HD060012 · NICHD · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY IN NEW ORLEANS · PI ANDERSON, ROSALIE · 2009 to 2012
$715k
Medical Research Council MR/K001744/1NICHD NIH HHS 3R15HD060012-01S1NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD022610NICHD NIH HHS P01HD022610NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD060012NICHD NIH HHS R15HD060012-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synovial joints are among the most important structures that give us complex motor abilities as humans. Degenerative joint diseases, such as arthritis, cause loss of normal joint functioning and affect over 40 million people in the USA and approximately 350 million people worldwide. Therapies based on regenerative medicine hold the promise of effectively repairing or replacing damaged joints permanently. Here, for the first time, we introduce a model for synovial joint regeneration utilizing the chick embryo. In this model, a block of tissue that contains the prospective elbow is excised, leaving a window with strips of anterior and posterior tissue intact (window excision, WE). In contrast, we also slice out the same area containing the elbow and the distal piece of the limb is pinned back onto the stump (slice excision, SE). Interestingly, when the elbow is removed via WE, regeneration of the joint takes place, whereas the elbow joint does not regenerate following SE. In order to investigate whether the regeneration response recapitulates the developmental program of forming joints, we used GDF-5 and Autotaxin (Atx) as joint tissue specific markers, and Sox-9 and Col-9 as cartilage markers for in situ hybridization on sections at different time points after WE and SE surgeries. Re-expression of GDF-5 and Atx is observed in the WE samples by 60h after surgery. In contrast, the majority of the samples that underwent SE surgery did not express GDF-5 and Atx. Also, in SE fusion of cartilage elements takes place and the joint interzone does not form. This is indicated by continuous Col-9 expression in SE limbs, whereas Col-9 is downregulated at the joint interzone in the regenerating WE samples. This order and pattern of gene expression observed in regenerates is similar to the development of a joint suggesting that regeneration recapitulates development at the molecular level. This model defines some of the conditions required for inducing joint regeneration in an otherwise nonregenerating environment. This knowledge can be useful for designing new therapeutic approaches for joint loss or for conditions affecting joint integrity in humans.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsChick EmbryoForelimbGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalJoints

Identifiers

PMID23036343
PMCPMC3501998
OpenAlexW1963513790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.