Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23034724›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2013

The risk of Barrett's esophagus associated with abdominal obesity in males and females.

Bradley J Kendall, Graeme A Macdonald, Nicholas K Hayward, Johannes B Prins, Suzanne O'Brien, David C Whiteman, Study of Digestive Health

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Central adiposity is associated with increased risk of esophageal inflammation, metaplasia, and adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Inverse Association Between Gluteofemoral Obesity and Risk of Barrett's Esophagus in a Pooled Analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Pathophysiological mechanisms linking obesity and esophageal adenocarcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2014
    Review
  16. The role of obesity in oesophageal cancer development.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bradley J KendallCancer Program, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. bradley.kendall@qimr.edu.au
Graeme A Macdonald
Nicholas K Hayward
Johannes B Prins
Suzanne O'Brien
David C Whiteman
Study of Digestive Health
The University of Queensland · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

Molecular epidemiology of Barretts esophagus and cancerR01CA001833 · NCI · QUEENSLAND INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI WHITEMAN, DAVID C · 2002 to 2006
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 001833NCI NIH HHS R01 CA001833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal adenocarcinoma arises from Barrett's esophagus (BE). Both occur predominantly in males. The role of abdominal obesity in this sex distribution is uncertain. Our study aimed to determine whether there is an association between abdominal obesity and risk of BE and if present was it modified by sex. A structured interview and anthropometric measures were conducted within a population-based case-control study. We recruited 237 BE cases (70% male) and 247 population controls, frequency matched by age and sex. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. In the overall group and males, all measures of abdominal obesity [waist circumference (WC), waist-hip ratio (WHR), sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) and waist-height ratio (WHtR)] were strongly associated with risk of BE (Overall: WC OR 2.2 95% CI 1.4-3.5, WHR 1.8 95% CI 1.2-2.9, SAD 2.3 95% CI 1.4-3.7, WHtR 1.9 95% CI 1.2-3.0, males WC 2.5 95% CI 1.4-4.3, WHR 2.4 95% CI 1.3-4.2, SAD 2.5 95% CI 1.4-4.3, WHtR 1.9 95% CI 1.1-3.4). These associations were minimally attenuated by adjusting for ever-symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). These findings suggest in males, non-GER factors related to abdominal obesity may be important in the development of BE. In females, there was modest association between measures of abdominal obesity and risk of BE but these were all abolished after adjusting for ever-symptoms of GER. The power to detect differences between sexes in the risk of BE associated with abdominal obesity was limited by the number of females in the study.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBarrett EsophagusCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, AbdominalPrognosisRisk FactorsSex FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23034724
PMCPMC4180019
OpenAlexW1988127543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.