ArticleBMC veterinary research2012
Risk factors for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection and resulting challenges for effective disease surveillance.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering biosecurity gaps: risk factors for PRRSV seropositivity in Costa Rican pig farms identified through machine learning.Porcine health management · 2026Article
- Genetic recombination and pathogenicity assessment of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 2 strains in China.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Cross-Correlation between Biosecurity Measures and the Detection of Viral and Bacterial Agents on German Farms with Respiratory Disease.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2024Article
- Spatiotemporal relative risk distribution of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in the United States.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Article
- Prevalence of porcine respiratory pathogens in slaughterhouses in Shanxi Province, China.Veterinary medicine and science · 2021Article
- Integrating animal movements with phylogeography to model the spread of PRRSV in the USA.Virus evolution · 2021Article
- Review
- Phylogeographic investigation of 2014 porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) transmission in Taiwan.PloS one · 2019Article
- Cross-sectional study on risk factors for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus sow herd instability in German breeding herds.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2018Article
- Development of a stochastic agent-based model to evaluate surveillance strategies for detection of emergent porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome strains.BMC veterinary research · 2017Article
- UK Pigs at the Time of Slaughter: Investigation into the Correlation of Infection with PRRSV and HEV.Viruses · 2017Article
- Article
- Review on the transmission porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus between pigs and farms and impact on vaccination.Veterinary research · 2016Review
- A prevalence study of Salmonella spp., Yersinia spp., Toxoplasma gondii and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in UK pigs at slaughter.Epidemiology and infection · 2016Article
- Article
- Comparison of different commercial ELISAs for detection of antibodies against porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus in serum.BMC veterinary research · 2014Article
- Spatial epidemiology of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome in Thailand.BMC veterinary research · 2014Article
- Describing antimicrobial use and reported treatment efficacy in Ontario swine using the Ontario Swine Veterinary-based Surveillance program.BMC veterinary research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to identify risk factors for active porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection at farm level and to assess the probability of an infected farm being detected through passive disease surveillance in England. Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study on 147 farrow-to-finish farms conducted from April 2008-April 2009. The risk factors for active PRRSV infection were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The surveillance system was evaluated using a stochastic scenario tree model.
resultsEvidence of PRRSV circulation was confirmed on 35.1% (95%CI: 26.8-43.4) of farms in the cross sectional study, with a higher proportion of infected farms in areas with high pig density (more than 15000 pigs within 10 km radius from the farm). Farms were more likely to have active PRRSV infection if they used the live virus vaccine-Porcilis PRRS (OR=7.5, 95%CI: 2.5-22.8), were located in high pig density areas (OR=2.9, 95%CI: 1.0-8.3) or had dead pigs collected (OR=5.6, 95%CI: 1.7-18.3). Farms that weaned pigs at 28 days of age or later had lower odds of being PRRSV positive compared to those weaning at 21-27 days (OR=0.2, 95%CI: 0.1-0.7). The probability of detecting an infected farm through passive surveillance for disease was low (mode=0.074, 5th and 95th percentiles: 0.067; 0.083 respectively). In particular farms which used live virus vaccine had lower probabilities for detection compared to those which did not.
conclusionsRisk factors identified highlight the importance of biosecurity measures for the incursion of PRRSV infection. The results further indicate that a combined approach of surveillance for infection and disease diagnosis is needed to assist effective control and/or elimination of PRRSV from the pig population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.