Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23034130›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2012

Cancer classification using the Immunoscore: a worldwide task force.

Jérôme Galon, Franck Pagès, Francesco M Marincola, Helen K Angell, Magdalena Thurin, Alessandro Lugli, Inti Zlobec, Anne Berger, Carlo Bifulco, Gerardo Botti and 54 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 447 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
447citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
24.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

447 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 799 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. [Recent Advances in Peripheral Immunoscore in Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025
    Review

387 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

64 authors at 20 institutions in 16 countries.

Jérôme GalonINSERM, U872, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Paris, F-75006, France. jerome.galon@crc.jussieu.fr
Franck Pagès
Francesco M Marincola
Helen K Angell
Magdalena Thurin
Alessandro Lugli
Inti Zlobec
Anne Berger
Carlo Bifulco
Gerardo Botti
Fabiana Tatangelo
Cedrik M Britten
Sebastian Kreiter
Lotfi Chouchane
Paolo Delrio
Hartmann Arndt
Martin Asslaber
Michele Maio
Giuseppe V Masucci
Martin Mihm
Fernando Vidal-Vanaclocha
James P Allison
Sacha Gnjatic
Leif Hakansson
Christoph Huber
Harpreet Singh-Jasuja
Christian Ottensmeier
Heinz Zwierzina
Luigi Laghi
Fabio Grizzi
Pamela S Ohashi
Patricia A Shaw
Blaise A Clarke
Bradly G Wouters
Yutaka Kawakami
Shoichi Hazama
Kiyotaka Okuno
Ena Wang
Jill O'Donnell-Tormey
Christine Lagorce
Graham Pawelec
Michael I Nishimura
Robert Hawkins
Réjean Lapointe
Andreas Lundqvist
Samir N Khleif
Shuji Ogino
Peter Gibbs
Paul Waring
Noriyuki Sato
Toshihiko Torigoe
Kyogo Itoh
Prabhu S Patel
Shilin N Shukla
Richard Palmqvist
Iris D Nagtegaal
Yili Wang
Corrado D'Arrigo
Scott Kopetz
Frank A Sinicrope
Giorgio Trinchieri
Thomas F Gajewski
Paolo A Ascierto
Bernard A Fox
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRGujarat Cancer & Research Institute · INHumanitas University · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USSapporo Medical University · JPSociety for Immunotherapy of Cancer · USUniversity of Bern · CHAugusta University Health · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCancer Research Institute · USDorset County Hospital · GBFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHarvard University · USImmatics Biotechnologies (Germany) · DEInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)KL2TR000370 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$4.3M
Translational Research in Colon Cancer Prevention & TreatmentK05CA142885 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SINICROPE, FRANK A. · 2009 to 2013
$808k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000370NCI NIH HHS K05 CA142885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of clinical outcome in cancer is usually achieved by histopathological evaluation of tissue samples obtained during surgical resection of the primary tumor. Traditional tumor staging (AJCC/UICC-TNM classification) summarizes data on tumor burden (T), presence of cancer cells in draining and regional lymph nodes (N) and evidence for metastases (M). However, it is now recognized that clinical outcome can significantly vary among patients within the same stage. The current classification provides limited prognostic information, and does not predict response to therapy. Recent literature has alluded to the importance of the host immune system in controlling tumor progression. Thus, evidence supports the notion to include immunological biomarkers, implemented as a tool for the prediction of prognosis and response to therapy. Accumulating data, collected from large cohorts of human cancers, has demonstrated the impact of immune-classification, which has a prognostic value that may add to the significance of the AJCC/UICC TNM-classification. It is therefore imperative to begin to incorporate the 'Immunoscore' into traditional classification, thus providing an essential prognostic and potentially predictive tool. Introduction of this parameter as a biomarker to classify cancers, as part of routine diagnostic and prognostic assessment of tumors, will facilitate clinical decision-making including rational stratification of patient treatment. Equally, the inherent complexity of quantitative immunohistochemistry, in conjunction with protocol variation across laboratories, analysis of different immune cell types, inconsistent region selection criteria, and variable ways to quantify immune infiltration, all underline the urgent requirement to reach assay harmonization. In an effort to promote the Immunoscore in routine clinical settings, an international task force was initiated. This review represents a follow-up of the announcement of this initiative, and of the J Transl Med. editorial from January 2012. Immunophenotyping of tumors may provide crucial novel prognostic information. The results of this international validation may result in the implementation of the Immunoscore as a new component for the classification of cancer, designated TNM-I (TNM-Immune).

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesInternationalityClassificationHumansNeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID23034130
PMCPMC3554496
OpenAlexW2119301589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.