ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2013
Move for Change Part II: a European survey evaluating the impact of the EPDA Charter for people with Parkinson's disease.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- An online platform to increase access to gait rehabilitation for underserved Parkinson's disease communities.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- The diagnostic pathway of Parkinson's disease: understanding patient perspectives in Australia.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Therapeutic education for empowerment and engagement in patients with Parkinson's disease: A non-pharmacological, interventional, multicentric, randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Toward Improved Treatment and Empowerment of Individuals With Parkinson Disease: Design and Evaluation of an Internet of Things System.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson's Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Observational
- Management, Levels of Support, Quality of Life, and Social Inclusion in Parkinson's Disease: Interventions, Innovation, and Practice Development.Parkinson's disease · 2021Article
- How People with Parkinson's Disease and Health Care Professionals Wish to Partner in Care Using eHealth: Co-Design Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Personalized care management for persons with Parkinson's disease: A telenursing solution.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2020Article
- Patients' Perspective of Comprehensive Parkinson Care in Rural Victoria.Parkinson's disease · 2020Article
- Dementia and Parkinson's Disease: Similar and Divergent Challenges in Providing Palliative Care.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Review
- Moving Parkinson care to the home.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe Move for Change campaign is a three-part series of pan-European surveys designed by the European Parkinson's Disease Association (EPDA) to assess the impact that the EPDA Charter for People with Parkinson's disease (PD) has had since its launch in 1997. Here, we report results from the second survey, focusing on the third right of the Charter; that is, 'all patients have the right to have access to support services'. Although the level of evidence for different support services varies, it is important to ensure that patients can access services with clinically proven benefits.
methodsThis survey comprised nine questions administered online via the EPDA and PD organization Web sites. Accessibility of support services was defined as 'services/medication/multidisciplinary healthcare professionals, etc. being available and on hand to patients when required'.
resultsNeurologists and general practitioners (GPs) received highest accessibility results (90.0 and 87.0% of respondents, respectively), with moderate results for physiotherapists (68.0%) and PD organizations (72.0%) and lower results for PD specialist nurses (26.0%), occupational therapists (23.0%), and counselors (27.0%). Support provided by neurologists and PD specialists was considered to be 'very helpful' by 59.0 and 55.7%, respectively, whilst only 31.8% of respondents gave such favorable ratings to GPs. Funding of services was variable across Europe.
conclusionsThese data demonstrate the challenges faced by PD patients in accessing the adequate care and support required throughout the course of their disease. These findings can assist healthcare professionals and policymakers in improving access to support services for patients and their families across Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.