ReviewCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2012
Imaging paradigms in assessment of rectal carcinoma: loco-regional and distant staging.
Review in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overstaging: A Challenge in Rectal Cancer Treatment.Visceral medicine · 2018Article
- Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the loco-regional staging of patients with rectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015Review
- Efficiency of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Liver Imaging Sequences Added to Initial Rectal MRI in Rectal Cancer Patients.PloS one · 2015Article
- Anorectal Cancer: Critical Anatomic and Staging Distinctions That Affect Use of Radiation Therapy.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, IncReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of imaging in the management of rectal malignancy has progressively evolved and undergone several paradigm shifts. Unlike a few decades ago when the role of a radiologist was restricted at defining the longitudinal extent of the tumour with barium enema, recent advances in imaging techniques permit highly accurate locoregional and distant staging of the disease as well as prognostication on those who are likely to have a postoperative recurrence. Computed tomography (CT) has always been the mainstay of imaging when evaluating for distant metastasis, with the advent of positron emission tomography/CT improving its specificity. In rectal malignancy, it is the local extent of the disease that often influences the surgical decision making and need for neoadjuvant therapy. Although endoscopic ultrasound has been the traditional technique for determining the depth of tumour invasion, over the last decade magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a very effective tool for accurate T-staging. This review intends to address the status of various imaging modalities and their advantages and limitations in detection, pretreatment staging, and assessment of therapeutic efficacy in rectal cancer, with emphasis on MRI of high spatial resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.