Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23032733›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2012

Next-generation oral preexposure prophylaxis: beyond tenofovir.

Bisrat K Abraham, Roy Gulick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sustained-release Griffithsin nanoparticle-fiber composites against HIV-1 and HSV-2 infections.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PrEP Implementation Science: State-of-the-Art and Research Agenda.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2015
    Article
  10. Adherence to preexposure prophylaxis: current, emerging, and anticipated bases of evidence.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antiretroviral pharmacology in mucosal tissues.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. HIV integrase inhibitors: 20-year landmark and challenges.Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2013
    Review
  16. Pre- and post-sexual exposure prophylaxis of HIV: An update.Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDS
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bisrat K AbrahamDivision of Infectious Diseases, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Roy Gulick
Cornell University · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
T32: Pathogenesis of Infectious Diseases Training ProgramT32AI007613 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ROY M. GULICK · 1999 to 2026
$8.8M
Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV-Infected PatientsK24AI051966 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GULICK, ROY M. · 2003 to 2012
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NIAID NIH HHS 5K24AI051966NIAID NIH HHS 5T32AI007613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewClinical trials of oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have focused on regimens of tenofovir (TDF) with or without emtricitabine (FTC). However, TDF may be associated with toxicities (renal, bone), and FTC may select for drug resistance. Both are also first-line drugs for HIV treatment. In this review, we discuss agents that might serve as alternatives to TDF/FTC for HIV PrEP. RECENT

findingsSeveral drug characteristics are important to consider when selecting agents for PrEP with the most critical being safety, tolerability, adequate penetration into target tissues for prevention of HIV infection, and long-lasting activity with convenient dosing. With these factors in mind, we review five potentially useful agents for PrEP. The first group includes drugs that are already Food and Drug Administration approved (maraviroc, raltegravir) with attributes that make them attractive for PrEP. The second group includes investigational agents with long-lasting activity that are being developed in parenteral form (rilpivirine-long acting, S/GSK1265744, ibalizumab). SUMMARY: Future PrEP drugs may give clinicians the flexibility to select agents on the basis of individual patient needs and preferences.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnti-HIV AgentsChemopreventionHIV InfectionsHumansAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID23032733
PMCPMC3732461
OpenAlexW2018995454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.