Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23031437›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2012

Adherence to the oral contraceptive pill: a cross-sectional survey of modifiable behavioural determinants.

Gerard J Molloy, Heather Graham, Hannah McGuinness

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Engineered drug delivery devices to address Global Health challenges.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Gerard J MolloyDivision of Psychology, School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK. gerry.molloy@nuigalway.ie
Heather Graham
Hannah McGuinness
University of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor adherence to the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) is reported as one of the main causes of unintended pregnancy in women that rely on this form of contraception. This study aims to estimate the associations between a range of well-established modifiable psychological factors and adherence to OCP.

methodA cross-sectional survey of 130 female University students currently using OCP (Mean age: 20.46 SD: 3.01, range 17-36) was conducted. An OCP specific Medication Adherence Report Scale was used to assess non-adherence. Psychological predictor measures included necessity and concern beliefs about OCP, intentions, perceived behavioural control (pbc), anticipated regret and action and coping planning. Multiple linear regression was used to analyse the data.

resultsFifty-two per cent of participants reported missing their OCP once or more per month and 14% twice or more per month. In bivariate analysis intentions (r = -0.25), perceived behavioural control (r= -0.66), anticipated regret (r=0.20), concerns about OCP (r =0.31), and action (r= -0.25) and coping (r= -0.28) planning were all significantly associated with adherence to OCP in the predicted direction. In a multivariate model almost half (48%) of the variation in OCP adherence could be explained. The strongest and only statistically significant predictors in this model were perceived behavioural control (β=-0.62, p<0.01) and coping planning (β =-0.23, p=0.03). A significant interaction between intentions and anticipated regret was also observed.

conclusionThe present data point to a number of key modifiable psychological determinants of OCP use. Future work will establish whether changing these variables results in better adherence to the OCP.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultConfidence IntervalsContraceptives, Oral, HormonalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMedication AdherenceOdds RatioRegression AnalysisYoung AdultContraceptives, Oral, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID23031437
PMCPMC3491039
OpenAlexW1999232522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.