Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23029552›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Gene expression in uninvolved oral mucosa of OSCC patients facilitates identification of markers predictive of OSCC outcomes.

Pawadee Lohavanichbutr, John Houck, David R Doody, Pei Wang, Eduardo Mendez, Neal Futran, Melissa P Upton, F Christopher Holsinger, Stephen M Schwartz, Chu Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Knock-down of ABCE1 gene induces G1/S arrest in human oral cancer cells.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pawadee LohavanichbutrProgram in Epidemiology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
John Houck
David R Doody
Pei Wang
Eduardo Mendez
Neal Futran
Melissa P Upton
F Christopher Holsinger
Stephen M Schwartz
Chu Chen
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Targeting the p53 pathway for reversal of oral premalignancyP50CA097007 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MYERS, JEFFREY NICHOLAS · 2002 to 2012
$26.1M
Paul Calabresi Clinical Oncology AwardK12CA088084 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI David S. Hong, Scott Kopetz · 2000 to 2026
$14.0M
ORAL CANCER: MOLECULAR PROFILES &CLINICAL OUTCOMESR01CA095419 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI CHEN, CHU · 2003 to 2010
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS 2 L30 CA117652-02A1NCI NIH HHS CA16672NCI NIH HHS K12 CA088084NCI NIH HHS L30 CA117652NCI NIH HHS NIH/NCI 5R01 CA095419NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097007NCI NIH HHS P50 CA97007NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) are among the most common cancers worldwide, with approximately 60% 5-yr survival rate. To identify potential markers for disease progression, we used Affymetrix U133 plus 2.0 arrays to examine the gene expression profiles of 167 primary tumor samples from OSCC patients, 58 uninvolved oral mucosae from OSCC patients and 45 normal oral mucosae from patients without oral cancer, all enrolled at one of the three University of Washington-affiliated medical centers between 2003 to 2008. We found 2,596 probe sets differentially expressed between 167 tumor samples and 45 normal samples. Among 2,596 probe sets, 71 were significantly and consistently up- or down-regulated in the comparison between normal samples and uninvolved oral samples and between uninvolved oral samples and tumor samples. Cox regression analyses showed that 20 of the 71 probe sets were significantly associated with progression-free survival. The risk score for each patient was calculated from coefficients of a Cox model incorporating these 20 probe sets. The hazard ratio (HR) associated with each unit change in the risk score adjusting for age, gender, tumor stage, and high-risk HPV status was 2.7 (95% CI: 2.0-3.8, p = 8.8E-10). The risk scores in an independent dataset of 74 OSCC patients from the MD Anderson Cancer Center was also significantly associated with progression-free survival independent of age, gender, and tumor stage (HR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.2, p = 0.008). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis showed that the most prominent biological pathway represented by the 71 probe sets was the Integrin cell surface interactions pathway. In conclusion, we identified 71 probe sets in which dysregulation occurred in both uninvolved oral mucosal and cancer samples. Dysregulation of 20 of the 71 probe sets was associated with progression-free survival and was validated in an independent dataset.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Adhesion MoleculesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMouth MucosaMouth NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion Molecules

Identifiers

PMID23029552
PMCPMC3460916
OpenAlexW1994322753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.