Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23029008›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Generation of corneal epithelial cells from induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human dermal fibroblast and corneal limbal epithelium.

Ryuhei Hayashi, Yuki Ishikawa, Miyuki Ito, Tomofumi Kageyama, Kuniko Takashiba, Tsuyoshi Fujioka, Motokazu Tsujikawa, Hiroyuki Miyoshi, Masayuki Yamato, Yukio Nakamura and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Focus on seed cells: stem cells in 3D bioprinting of corneal grafts.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  10. Cell-based Therapies for Corneal and Retinal Disorders.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ryuhei HayashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yuki Ishikawa
Miyuki Ito
Tomofumi Kageyama
Kuniko Takashiba
Tsuyoshi Fujioka
Motokazu Tsujikawa
Hiroyuki Miyoshi
Masayuki Yamato
Yukio Nakamura
Kohji Nishida
Osaka University · JPRIKEN BioResource Research Center · JPTohoku University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells can be established from somatic cells. However, there is currently no established strategy to generate corneal epithelial cells from iPS cells. In this study, we investigated whether corneal epithelial cells could be differentiated from iPS cells. We tested 2 distinct sources: human adult dermal fibroblast (HDF)-derived iPS cells (253G1) and human adult corneal limbal epithelial cells (HLEC)-derived iPS cells (L1B41). We first established iPS cells from HLEC by introducing the Yamanaka 4 factors. Corneal epithelial cells were successfully induced from the iPS cells by the stromal cell-derived inducing activity (SDIA) differentiation method, as Pax6(+)/K12(+) corneal epithelial colonies were observed after prolonged differentiation culture (12 weeks or later) in both the L1B41 and 253G1 iPS cells following retinal pigment epithelial and lens cell induction. Interestingly, the corneal epithelial differentiation efficiency was higher in L1B41 than in 253G1. DNA methylation analysis revealed that a small proportion of differentially methylated regions still existed between L1B41 and 253G1 iPS cells even though no significant difference in methylation status was detected in the specific corneal epithelium-related genes such as K12, K3, and Pax6. The present study is the first to demonstrate a strategy for corneal epithelial cell differentiation from human iPS cells, and further suggests that the epigenomic status is associated with the propensity of iPS cells to differentiate into corneal epithelial cells.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell LineCells, CulturedDNA MethylationEpithelial CellsEpithelium, CornealFibroblastsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsLimbus CorneaeOctamer Transcription Factor-3Oligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mybReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsOctamer Transcription Factor-3POU5F1 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mybSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23029008
PMCPMC3454439
OpenAlexW1985333059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.