ArticlePloS one2012
Genome-wide prediction and validation of sigma70 promoters in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel genetic modules encoding high-level antibiotic-free protein expression in probiotic lactobacilli.Microbial biotechnology · 2023Article
- Characterization of the Positive Transcription Regulator PfaR for Improving Eicosapentaenoic Acid Production in Shewanella putrefaciens W3-18-1.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Critical assessment of computational tools for prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoter prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Transcriptome Analysis of a Spray Drying-Resistant Subpopulation Reveals a Zinc-Dependent Mechanism for Robustness inFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Conserved S-Layer-Associated Proteins Revealed by Exoproteomic Survey of S-Layer-Forming Lactobacilli.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2016Article
- Expression of heterologous sigma factors enables functional screening of metagenomic and heterologous genomic libraries.Nature communications · 2015Article
- Distinguishing between productive and abortive promoters using a random forest classifier in Mycoplasma pneumoniae.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn prokaryotes, sigma factors are essential for directing the transcription machinery towards promoters. Various sigma factors have been described that recognize, and bind to specific DNA sequence motifs in promoter sequences. The canonical sigma factor σ(70) is commonly involved in transcription of the cell's housekeeping genes, which is mediated by the conserved σ(70) promoter sequence motifs. In this study the σ(70)-promoter sequences in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 were predicted using a genome-wide analysis. The accuracy of the transcriptionally-active part of this promoter prediction was subsequently evaluated by correlating locations of predicted promoters with transcription start sites inferred from the 5'-ends of transcripts detected by high-resolution tiling array transcriptome datasets.
resultsTo identify σ(70)-related promoter sequences, we performed a genome-wide sequence motif scan of the L. plantarum WCFS1 genome focussing on the regions upstream of protein-encoding genes. We obtained several highly conserved motifs including those resembling the conserved σ(70)-promoter consensus. Position weight matrices-based models of the recovered σ(70)-promoter sequence motif were employed to identify 3874 motifs with significant similarity (p-value<10(-4)) to the model-motif in the L. plantarum genome. Genome-wide transcript information deduced from whole genome tiling-array transcriptome datasets, was used to infer transcription start sites (TSSs) from the 5'-end of transcripts. By this procedure, 1167 putative TSSs were identified that were used to corroborate the transcriptionally active fraction of these predicted promoters. In total, 568 predicted promoters were found in proximity (≤ 40 nucleotides) of the putative TSSs, showing a highly significant co-occurrence of predicted promoter and TSS (p-value<10(-263)).
conclusionsHigh-resolution tiling arrays provide a suitable source to infer TSSs at a genome-wide level, and allow experimental verification of in silico predicted promoter sequence motifs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.