Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23028744›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2012

Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in bladder cancer and patient prognosis: results from a large clinical cohort and meta-analysis.

Maciej J Czachorowski, André F S Amaral, Santiago Montes-Moreno, Josep Lloreta, Alfredo Carrato, Adonina Tardón, Manuel M Morente, Manolis Kogevinas, Francisco X Real, Núria Malats and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Combination of EPOncoimmunology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A review of the application of inflammatory biomarkers in epidemiologic cancer research.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Maciej J CzachorowskiGenetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
André F S Amaral
Santiago Montes-Moreno
Josep Lloreta
Alfredo Carrato
Adonina Tardón
Manuel M Morente
Manolis Kogevinas
Francisco X Real
Núria Malats
SBC/EPICURO investigators
Spanish National Cancer Research Centre · ESCenter for Research in Environmental Epidemiology · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital General Universitario de Elche · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESUniversidad de Oviedo · ES

Funding

GENETIC MARKERS OF BLADDER CANCER PROGRESSIONR01CA089715 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ALBERTSON, DONNA G · 2001 to 2012
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrant overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) is observed in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). Studies evaluating COX2 as a prognostic marker in UCB report contradictory results. We determined the prognostic potential of COX2 expression in UCB and quantitatively summarize the results with those of the literature through a meta-analysis. Newly diagnosed UCB patients recruited between 1998-2001 in 18 Spanish hospitals were prospectively included in the study and followed-up (median, 70.7 months). Diagnostic slides were reviewed and uniformly classified by expert pathologists. Clinical data was retrieved from hospital charts. Tissue microarrays containing non-muscle invasive (n=557) and muscle invasive (n=216) tumours were analyzed by immunohistochemistry using quantitative image analysis. Expression was evaluated in Cox regression models to assess the risk of recurrence, progression and disease-specific mortality. Meta-hazard ratios were estimated using our results and those from 11 additional evaluable studies. COX2 expression was observed in 38% (211/557) of non-muscle invasive and 63% (137/216) of muscle invasive tumors. Expression was associated with advanced pathological stage and grade (p<0.0001). In the univariable analyses, COX2 expression - as a categorical variable - was not associated with any of the outcomes analyzed. As a continuous variable, a weak association with recurrence in non-muscle invasive tumors was observed (p-value=0.048). In the multivariable analyses, COX2 expression did not independently predict any of the considered outcomes. The meta-analysis confirmed these results. We did not find evidence that COX2 expression is an independent prognostic marker of recurrence, progression or survival in patients with UCB.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCyclooxygenase 2FemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisRisk FactorsTissue Array AnalysisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsYoung AdultCyclooxygenase 2PTGS2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23028744
PMCPMC3441520
OpenAlexW2030734252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.