Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23028553›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2012

Excess body mass index and risk of liver cancer: a nonlinear dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Rui Rui, Jiao Lou, Li Zou, Rong Zhong, Ji Wang, Ding Xia, Qi Wang, Heng Li, Jing Wu, Xuzai Lu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Bariatric Surgery in Cirrhosis: Expert Review.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Liver Cancer Mortality Rates in Peru: Trend Analysis from 2003 to 2017.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Chemopreventive strategies in hepatocellular carcinoma.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2014
    Review
  20. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Etiology and Current and Future Drugs.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rui RuiDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jiao Lou
Li Zou
Rong Zhong
Ji Wang
Ding Xia
Qi Wang
Heng Li
Jing Wu
Xuzai Lu
Chuanqi Li
Li Liu
Jiahong Xia
Hua Xu
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNTongji Hospital · CNGuangdong Pharmaceutical University · CNUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcess body weight measured as body mass index (BMI) has a positive association with risk of common cancers. However, previous meta-analyses related to BMI and liver cancer had inconsistent results. The purpose of the current study is to establish a nonlinear dose-response relationship between BMI and incidence risk of liver cancer.

methodsA systematic literature search for relevant articles published from 1966 to November 2011 was conducted in PUBMED and EMBASE digital databases. Additional articles were manually searched by using the reference lists of identified papers. Restricted cubic splines and generalized least-squares regression methods were used to model a potential curvilinear relationship and to make a dose-response meta-analysis. Stratified analysis, sensitivity analysis and assessment of bias were performed in our meta-analysis.

results8 articles including 1,779,471 cohort individuals were brought into meta-analysis. A non-linear dose-response association between BMI and risk of liver cancer was visually significant (P for nonlinearity<0.001), besides, the point value of BMI also enhanced the results quantitatively, where relative risks were 1.02 (95%CI = 1.02-1.03), 1.35 (95%CI = 1.24-1.47) and 2.22-fold (95%CI = 1.74-2.83) when BMI was at the point of 25, 30 and 35 kg/m(2) compared with reference (the median value of the lowest category), respectively. The ethnicity of the population was found as the main source of heterogeneity. In subsequent stratified analysis, no evidence of heterogeneity was showed in Asian and White populations (P for heterogeneity>0.1), and all value of BMI still presented significantly increased risk of cancer.

conclusionsThe findings from meta-analysis provided that excess BMI had significant increased association with risk of liver cancer, although the biological mechanisms underlying the obesity-cancer link still need to be clarified.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexHumansLiver NeoplasmsProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23028553
PMCPMC3445525
OpenAlexW1995586054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.