ArticlePloS one2012
Gene regulatory network inference from multifactorial perturbation data using both regression and correlation analyses.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insight into the role of Sho1 in high-hydrostatic pressure and oxidative stress adaptation of the hadal fungusApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- TopoDoE: a design of experiment strategy for selection and refinement in ensembles of executable gene regulatory networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Construction of Condition-Specific Gene Regulatory Network Using Kernel Canonical Correlation Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- LiPLike: towards gene regulatory network predictions of high certainty.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Network inference performance complexity: a consequence of topological, experimental and algorithmic determinants.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Structure Optimization for Large Gene Networks Based on Greedy Strategy.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2018Article
- A Sparse Reconstruction Approach for Identifying Gene Regulatory Networks Using Steady-State Experiment Data.PloS one · 2015Article
- Integration of steady-state and temporal gene expression data for the inference of gene regulatory networks.PloS one · 2013Article
- A Kalman-filter based approach to identification of time-varying gene regulatory networks.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An important problem in systems biology is to reconstruct gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from experimental data and other a priori information. The DREAM project offers some types of experimental data, such as knockout data, knockdown data, time series data, etc. Among them, multifactorial perturbation data are easier and less expensive to obtain than other types of experimental data and are thus more common in practice. In this article, a new algorithm is presented for the inference of GRNs using the DREAM4 multifactorial perturbation data. The GRN inference problem among [Formula: see text] genes is decomposed into [Formula: see text] different regression problems. In each of the regression problems, the expression level of a target gene is predicted solely from the expression level of a potential regulation gene. For different potential regulation genes, different weights for a specific target gene are constructed by using the sum of squared residuals and the Pearson correlation coefficient. Then these weights are normalized to reflect effort differences of regulating distinct genes. By appropriately choosing the parameters of the power law, we constructe a 0-1 integer programming problem. By solving this problem, direct regulation genes for an arbitrary gene can be estimated. And, the normalized weight of a gene is modified, on the basis of the estimation results about the existence of direct regulations to it. These normalized and modified weights are used in queuing the possibility of the existence of a corresponding direct regulation. Computation results with the DREAM4 In Silico Size 100 Multifactorial subchallenge show that estimation performances of the suggested algorithm can even outperform the best team. Using the real data provided by the DREAM5 Network Inference Challenge, estimation performances can be ranked third. Furthermore, the high precision of the obtained most reliable predictions shows the suggested algorithm may be helpful in guiding biological experiment designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.