ArticlePloS one2012
PHYMYCO-DB: a curated database for analyses of fungal diversity and evolution.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and application of a novel beta-tubulin genotyping tool reveals host-specific transmission cluster in Balantioides coli.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- The Use of the Internal Transcribed Spacer Region for Phylogenetic Analysis of the Microsporidian ParasiteJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Arbuscular mycorrhiza and plant growth promoting endophytes facilitates accumulation of saponin under moderate drought stress.Chinese herbal medicines · 2024Article
- Ecological corridors homogenize plant root endospheric mycobiota.The New phytologist · 2023Article
- Drug Resistance-Associated Mutations inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Identification and analysis of CYP450 and UGT supergene family members from the transcriptome of Aralia elata (Miq.) seem reveal candidate genes for triterpenoid saponin biosynthesis.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
- Taxonomic assignment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in an 18S metagenomic dataset: a case study with saltcedar (Tamarix aphylla).Mycorrhiza · 2020Article
- GenBank is a reliable resource for 21st century biodiversity research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Article
- Critical Issues in Mycobiota Analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- The mycobiome of the human urinary tract: potential roles for fungi in urology.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Review
- Specialized Microbiome of a Halophyte and its Role in Helping Non-Host Plants to Withstand Salinity.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Skin fungal community and its correlation with bacterial community of urban Chinese individuals.Microbiome · 2016Article
- The human mycobiome.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014Review
- Finding needles in haystacks: linking scientific names, reference specimens and molecular data for Fungi.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn environmental sequencing studies, fungi can be identified based on nucleic acid sequences, using either highly variable sequences as species barcodes or conserved sequences containing a high-quality phylogenetic signal. For the latter, identification relies on phylogenetic analyses and the adoption of the phylogenetic species concept. Such analysis requires that the reference sequences are well identified and deposited in public-access databases. However, many entries in the public sequence databases are problematic in terms of quality and reliability and these data require screening to ensure correct phylogenetic interpretation. METHODS AND PRINCIPAL
findingsTo facilitate phylogenetic inferences and phylogenetic assignment, we introduce a fungal sequence database. The database PHYMYCO-DB comprises fungal sequences from GenBank that have been filtered to satisfy stringent sequence quality criteria. For the first release, two widely used molecular taxonomic markers were chosen: the nuclear SSU rRNA and EF1-α gene sequences. Following the automatic extraction and filtration, a manual curation is performed to remove problematic sequences while preserving relevant sequences useful for phylogenetic studies. As a result of curation, ~20% of the automatically filtered sequences have been removed from the database. To demonstrate how PHYMYCO-DB can be employed, we test a set of environmental Chytridiomycota sequences obtained from deep sea samples.
conclusionPHYMYCO-DB offers the tools necessary to: (i) extract high quality fungal sequences for each of the 5 fungal phyla, at all taxonomic levels, (ii) extract already performed alignments, to act as 'reference alignments', (iii) launch alignments of personal sequences along with stored data. A total of 9120 SSU rRNA and 672 EF1-α high-quality fungal sequences are now available. The PHYMYCO-DB is accessible through the URL http://phymycodb.genouest.org/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.