Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23028445›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

PHYMYCO-DB: a curated database for analyses of fungal diversity and evolution.

Stéphane Mahé, Marie Duhamel, Thomas Le Calvez, Laetitia Guillot, Ludmila Sarbu, Anthony Bretaudeau, Olivier Collin, Alexis Dufresne, E Toby Kiers, Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Drug Resistance-Associated Mutations inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. GenBank is a reliable resource for 21st century biodiversity research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Critical Issues in Mycobiota Analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The human mycobiome.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stéphane MahéUniversité de Rennes I, CNRS, UMR 6553 ECOBIO, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
Marie Duhamel
Thomas Le Calvez
Laetitia Guillot
Ludmila Sarbu
Anthony Bretaudeau
Olivier Collin
Alexis Dufresne
E Toby Kiers
Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse
Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires · FRUniversité Européenne de Bretagne · FRVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FREcosystèmes, Biodiversité, Evolution · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn environmental sequencing studies, fungi can be identified based on nucleic acid sequences, using either highly variable sequences as species barcodes or conserved sequences containing a high-quality phylogenetic signal. For the latter, identification relies on phylogenetic analyses and the adoption of the phylogenetic species concept. Such analysis requires that the reference sequences are well identified and deposited in public-access databases. However, many entries in the public sequence databases are problematic in terms of quality and reliability and these data require screening to ensure correct phylogenetic interpretation. METHODS AND PRINCIPAL

findingsTo facilitate phylogenetic inferences and phylogenetic assignment, we introduce a fungal sequence database. The database PHYMYCO-DB comprises fungal sequences from GenBank that have been filtered to satisfy stringent sequence quality criteria. For the first release, two widely used molecular taxonomic markers were chosen: the nuclear SSU rRNA and EF1-α gene sequences. Following the automatic extraction and filtration, a manual curation is performed to remove problematic sequences while preserving relevant sequences useful for phylogenetic studies. As a result of curation, ~20% of the automatically filtered sequences have been removed from the database. To demonstrate how PHYMYCO-DB can be employed, we test a set of environmental Chytridiomycota sequences obtained from deep sea samples.

conclusionPHYMYCO-DB offers the tools necessary to: (i) extract high quality fungal sequences for each of the 5 fungal phyla, at all taxonomic levels, (ii) extract already performed alignments, to act as 'reference alignments', (iii) launch alignments of personal sequences along with stored data. A total of 9120 SSU rRNA and 672 EF1-α high-quality fungal sequences are now available. The PHYMYCO-DB is accessible through the URL http://phymycodb.genouest.org/.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationBase SequenceFungiInternetMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNA, RibosomalSequence AlignmentRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID23028445
PMCPMC3441585
OpenAlexW2170348714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.