Psychotic experiences: disadvantaged and different from the norm.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Reflections on the explanations of higher psychosis rates among migrant and ethnic minority populations: A critical discourse analysis.Transcultural psychiatry · 2025
   Review
2. Assessing the risk for suicide in schizophrenia according to migration, ethnicity and geographical ancestry.BMC psychiatry · 2017
   Article
3. The role of schizotypy in the study of the etiology of schizophrenia spectrum disorders.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2015
   Review
4. The impact of immigration and visible minority status on psychosis symptom profile.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Ethnic density as a buffer for psychotic experiences: findings from a national survey (EMPIRIC).2012

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as