Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23027870›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2012

Hyperactivity of the Ero1α oxidase elicits endoplasmic reticulum stress but no broad antioxidant response.

Henning Gram Hansen, Jonas Damgård Schmidt, Cecilie Lützen Søltoft, Thomas Ramming, Henrik Marcus Geertz-Hansen, Brian Christensen, Esben Skipper Sørensen, Agnieszka Sierakowska Juncker, Christian Appenzeller-Herzog, Lars Ellgaard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Henning Gram HansenDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N., Denmark.
Jonas Damgård Schmidt
Cecilie Lützen Søltoft
Thomas Ramming
Henrik Marcus Geertz-Hansen
Brian Christensen
Esben Skipper Sørensen
Agnieszka Sierakowska Juncker
Christian Appenzeller-Herzog
Lars Ellgaard
University of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University · DKNovo Nordisk Foundation · DKNovozymes (Denmark) · DKUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxidizing equivalents for the process of oxidative protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of mammalian cells are mainly provided by the Ero1α oxidase. The molecular mechanisms that regulate Ero1α activity in order to harness its oxidative power are quite well understood. However, the overall cellular response to oxidative stress generated by Ero1α in the lumen of the mammalian ER is poorly characterized. Here we investigate the effects of overexpressing a hyperactive mutant (C104A/C131A) of Ero1α. We show that Ero1α hyperactivity leads to hyperoxidation of the ER oxidoreductase ERp57 and induces expression of two established unfolded protein response (UPR) targets, BiP (immunoglobulin-binding protein) and HERP (homocysteine-induced ER protein). These effects could be reverted or aggravated by N-acetylcysteine and buthionine sulfoximine, respectively. Because both agents manipulate the cellular glutathione redox buffer, we conclude that the observed effects of Ero1α-C104A/C131A overexpression are likely caused by an oxidative perturbation of the ER glutathione redox buffer. In accordance, we show that Ero1α hyperactivity affects cell viability when cellular glutathione levels are compromised. Using microarray analysis, we demonstrate that the cell reacts to the oxidative challenge caused by Ero1α hyperactivity by turning on the UPR. Moreover, this analysis allowed the identification of two new targets of the mammalian UPR, CRELD1 and c18orf45. Interestingly, a broad antioxidant response was not induced. Our findings suggest that the hyperoxidation generated by Ero1α-C104A/C131A is addressed in the ER lumen and is unlikely to exert oxidative injury throughout the cell.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic Reticulum StressUnfolded Protein ResponseAcetylcysteineAmino Acid SubstitutionButhionine SulfoximineCell Adhesion MoleculesEnzyme InhibitorsExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFree Radical ScavengersHEK293 CellsHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsMutation, MissenseOxidation-ReductionOxidoreductasesAcetylcysteineButhionine SulfoximineCell Adhesion MoleculesCRELD1 protein, humanEnzyme InhibitorsERO1A protein, humanExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFree Radical ScavengersMembrane GlycoproteinsOxidoreductases

Identifiers

PMID23027870
PMCPMC3501080
OpenAlexW1994861981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.