Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23027618›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2013

DNA repair gene variants in relation to overall cancer risk: a population-based study.

Anthony J Alberg, Timothy J Jorgensen, Ingo Ruczinski, Lee Wheless, Yin Yao Shugart, Yvette Berthier-Schaad, Bailey Kessing, Judith Hoffman-Bolton, Kathy J Helzlsouer, W H Linda Kao and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Differential expression of cytokeratin 14 and 18 in bladder cancer tumorigenesis.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony J AlbergHollings Cancer Center and Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. alberg@musc.edu
Timothy J Jorgensen
Ingo Ruczinski
Lee Wheless
Yin Yao Shugart
Yvette Berthier-Schaad
Bailey Kessing
Judith Hoffman-Bolton
Kathy J Helzlsouer
W H Linda Kao
Lesley Francis
Rhoda M Alani
Michael W Smith
Paul T Strickland
Johns Hopkins University · USMUSC Hollings Cancer Center · USBoston University · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USGeorgetown University · USMercy Medical Center · USNational Institute of Mental Health · USScience Applications International Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

DNA Repair, Skin Cancer and Overall Cancer RiskR01CA105069 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ALBERG, ANTHONY J · 2005 to 2009
$2.4M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS R01 CA105069PHS HHS HHSN26120080001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypothesis that germ-line polymorphisms in DNA repair genes influence cancer risk has previously been tested primarily on a cancer site-specific basis. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that DNA repair gene allelic variants contribute to globally elevated cancer risk by measuring associations with risk of all cancers that occurred within a population-based cohort. In the CLUE II cohort study established in 1989 in Washington County, MD, this study was comprised of all 3619 cancer cases ascertained through 2007 compared with a sample of 2296 with no cancer. Associations were measured between 759 DNA repair gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and risk of all cancers. A SNP in O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, MGMT, (rs2296675) was significantly associated with overall cancer risk [per minor allele odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-1.43 and P-value: 4.1 × 10(-8)]. The association between rs2296675 and cancer risk was stronger among those aged ≤54 years old than those who were ≥55 years at baseline (P-for-(interaction) = 0.021). OR were in the direction of increased risk for all 15 categories of malignancies studied (P < 0.0001), ranging from 1.22 (P = 0.42) for ovarian cancer to 2.01 (P = 0.008) for urinary tract cancers; the smallest P-value was for breast cancer (OR 1.45, P = 0.0002). The results indicate that the minor allele of MGMT SNP rs2296675, a common genetic marker with 37% carriers, was significantly associated with increased risk of cancer across multiple tissues. Replication is needed to more definitively determine the scientific and public health significance of this observed association.

Indexed as

AdultDNA RepairFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMarylandNeoplasmsPopulation SurveillanceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23027618
PMCPMC3534189
OpenAlexW2125602466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.