Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23027591›Full record

ReviewCytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.)2013

A critical reevaluation of the stationary axonal cytoskeleton hypothesis.

Anthony Brown, Peter Jung

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The role of mechanics in axonal stability and development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Neurofilaments in health and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Multiscale Mechanobiology in Brain Physiology and Diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tension-driven axon assembly: a possible mechanism.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Severing and end-to-end annealing of neurofilaments in neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony BrownDepartment of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. brown.2302@osu.edu
Peter Jung
Ohio University · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

AXONAL TRANSPORT OF NEUROFILAMENTSR01NS038526 · NINDS · OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS · PI BROWN, ANTHONY · 1999 to 2018
$5.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurofilaments are transported along axons in a rapid intermittent and bidirectional manner but there is a long-standing controversy about whether this applies to all axonal neurofilaments. Some have proposed that only a small proportion of axonal neurofilaments are mobile and that most are deposited into a persistently stationary and extensively cross-linked cytoskeleton that remains fixed in place for many months without movement, turning over very slowly. In contrast, others have proposed that this hypothesis is based on a misinterpretation of the experimental data and that, in fact, all axonal neurofilaments move. These contrary perspectives have distinct implications for our understanding of how neurofilaments are organized and reorganized in axons both in health and disease. Here, we discuss the history and substance of this controversy. We show that the published data on the kinetics and distribution of neurofilaments along axons favor a simple "stop and go" transport model in which axons contain a single population of neurofilaments that all move in a stochastic, bidirectional and intermittent manner. Based on these considerations, we propose a dynamic view of the neuronal cytoskeleton in which all neurofilaments cycle repeatedly between moving and pausing states throughout their journey along the axon. The filaments move infrequently, but the average pause duration is on the order of hours rather than weeks or months. Against this fluid backdrop, the action of molecular motors on neurofilaments can have dramatic effects on neurofilament organization that would not be possible if the neurofilaments were extensively cross-linked into a truly stationary network.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsCytoskeletonHumansNeurofilament ProteinsOptic NerveNeurofilament Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23027591
PMCPMC3725768
OpenAlexW1976476991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.