Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23027194›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

Exacerbation of influenza virus infections in mice by intranasal treatments and implications for evaluation of antiviral drugs.

Donald F Smee, Mark von Itzstein, Beenu Bhatt, E Bart Tarbet

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Targeted recruitment of immune effector cells for rapid eradication of influenza virus infections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intranasal delivery of adjuvant-free peptide nanofibers elicits resident CD8Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Donald F SmeeDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA. don.smee@usu.edu
Mark von Itzstein
Beenu Bhatt
E Bart Tarbet
Griffith University · AUUtah State University · US

Funding

MACROPHAGE DEFENSES AGAINST HAEMOPHILUS INFLUENZAER29AI030063 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI NOEL, GARY J. · 1990 to 1994
–
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000039INIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030063PHS HHS HHSN27200005/A37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compounds lacking oral activity may be delivered intranasally to treat influenza virus infections in mice. However, intranasal treatments greatly enhance the virulence of such virus infections. This can be partially compensated for by giving reduced virus challenge doses. These can be 100- to 1,000-fold lower than infections without such treatment and still cause equivalent mortality. We found that intranasal liquid treatments facilitate virus production (probably through enhanced virus spread) and that lung pneumonia was delayed by only 2 days relative to a 1,000-fold higher virus challenge dose not accompanied by intranasal treatments. In one study, zanamivir was 90 to 100% effective at 10 mg/kg/day by oral, intraperitoneal, and intramuscular routes against influenza A/California/04/2009 (H1N1) virus in mice. However, the same compound administered intranasally at 20 mg/kg/day for 5 days gave no protection from death although the time to death was significantly delayed. A related compound, Neu5Ac2en (N-acetyl-2,3-dehydro-2-deoxyneuraminic acid), was ineffective at 100 mg/kg/day. Intranasal zanamivir and Neu5Ac2en were 70 to 100% protective against influenza A/NWS/33 (H1N1) virus infections at 0.1 to 10 and 30 to 100 mg/kg/day, respectively. Somewhat more difficult to treat was A/Victoria/3/75 virus that required 10 mg/kg/day of zanamivir to achieve full protection. These results illustrate that treatment of influenza virus infections by the intranasal route requires consideration of both virus challenge dose and virus strain in order to avoid compromising the effectiveness of a potentially useful antiviral agent. In addition, the intranasal treatments were shown to facilitate virus replication and promote lung pathology.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnimalsAntiviral AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanLungMiceMice, Inbred BALB CN-Acetylneuraminic AcidVirus ReplicationZanamivir2-deoxy-2,3-dehydro-N-acetylneuraminic acidAntiviral AgentsN-Acetylneuraminic AcidZanamivir

Identifiers

PMID23027194
PMCPMC3497157
OpenAlexW2128663723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.