Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23027003›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2013

Intravital microscopy to image membrane trafficking in live rats.

Andrius Masedunskas, Monika Sramkova, Laura Parente, Roberto Weigert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Actually Seeing What Is Going on - Intravital Microscopy in Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Imaging the dynamics of endocytosis in live mammalian tissues.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrius MasedunskasIntracellular Membrane Trafficking Unit, Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Monika Sramkova
Laura Parente
Roberto Weigert

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms regulating membrane trafficking in salivary glandsZIADE000717 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI WEIGERT, ROBERTO · 2009 to 2015
$9.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DE000717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravital microscopy is a powerful tool that enables imaging various biological processes in live animals. Here, we describe a series of procedures designed to image subcellular structures, such as endosomes and secretory vesicles in the salivary glands (SGs) of live rats. To this aim, we used fluorescently labeled molecules and/or fluorescently tagged proteins that were transiently transfected in the live animal.

Indexed as

EndocytosisAnimalsExocytosisFluorescent DyesGene Transfer TechniquesMicroscopy, ConfocalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRestraint, PhysicalStaining and LabelingSubmandibular GlandTime-Lapse ImagingFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID23027003
PMCPMC4052536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.