Trial reportClinical drug investigation2012
Comparative pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel besylate and clopidogrel bisulfate in healthy Korean subjects.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vitro-In Silico Approach in the Development of Clopidogrel Solid Dispersion Formulations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Carboxylic Acid Counterions in FDA-Approved Pharmaceutical Salts.Pharmaceutical research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClopidogrel selectively inhibits platelet aggregation. Clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix(®)) was first developed for atherothrombosis prevention and is commonly prescribed for this indication. A new clopidogrel formulation, clopidogrel besylate (KOVIX(®)), has recently been developed.
objectiveThis study was designed to compare the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and tolerability of clopidogrel besylate with those of clopidogrel bisulfate in 40 healthy male subjects.
methodsThis was an open-label, randomized-sequence, multiple-dose, two-period, two-treatment crossover study. The subjects were randomly assigned to a sequence group that received two treatments: clopidogrel besylate 75 mg followed by clopidogrel bisulfate 75 mg, or vice versa. The subjects received a 300-mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 75 mg daily for the next 4 days. Serial blood samples were collected to determine the concentrations of clopidogrel and its carboxylic acid metabolite, SR26334. Platelet aggregation and bleeding times were measured. Tolerability was evaluated throughout the study.
resultsThe clopidogrel plasma concentration-time profiles of the formulations were similar. The measured pharmacokinetic parameters did not differ significantly between the clopidogrel besylate and clopidogrel bisulfate groups. The geometric mean ratios of the clopidogrel besylate group to the clopidogrel bisulfate group with respect to the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the time of last measurable concentration (AUC(last)) were 0.96 (90 % confidence interval [CI] 0.82, 1.12) and 0.95 (0.81, 1.11), respectively. Moreover, the pharmacokinetic parameters of SR26334 did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. Furthermore, the areas under the platelet aggregation inhibition-time curves (AUIC) and the maximum inhibitory effects (I(max)) did not differ significantly between the two groups. The geometric mean ratios (clopidogrel besylate to clopidogrel bisulfate) were 1.01 (90 % CI 0.95, 1.08) for the I(max) and 0.98 (0.89, 1.07) for the AUIC. Both formulations were well tolerated and exhibited comparable safety profiles.
conclusionThis study demonstrated that the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of clopidogrel besylate were not significantly different from those of clopidogrel bisulfate. Both formulations were well tolerated in healthy subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.